As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
People have different views about the impacts of technology on human’s intellectual capabilities. While some argue that new technologies which help people to solve their problems lead to a reduced ability of thinking, I believe that technology aid people to gain more time to think about hard problems, and provide them with a richer knowledge base which lead to a stronger intellectual performance.
The main reason is that technology saves time. In fact, using technology, people have more time to think about difficult problems. For example, commuting between different parts of a city has become quicker. Another example is that getting news has become easier. In addition, you can wash your dirty clothes in an hour, whereas, in the past, you should spend a lot time going near rivers and wash your clothes. Therefore, technology has given a lot of time to people to ponder important issues.
Another aspect to consider is that technology gives a lot of information to people. Internet has provided an spectacular opportunity for people to know whatever they desire. For instance, Science Direct provides up to date scientific articles in any issue such that if some one wants to know about a specific scientific topic, he/she can easily be aware of the most recent progresses in the world. On the basis of a broadened knowledge, people can think about a wide variety of problems, which they could not do in the past. Since knowledge is the foundation for thinking deeper and more extended, by technology providing more information for people, they can think about more important issues easily.
However, the statement argues that technology makes it difficult for people to think. They assume that brain is somehow similar to body. Should you do not exercise regularly, your muscles will get weaker. Likewise, if you do not exploit your intellectual ability, your brain abilities dwindle. In my opinion, the statement, however, does not consider the incipient problems of the modern world. Technology not only solved a lot of problems, but also created a lot of new riddles. Thus, the human brain abilities are still in use may be even more than the past.
In conclusion, although it is understandable that if the technology caused humans to think less often, then they would lose their thinking ability in the long run, as discussed above, I, personally, believe that technology by saving more time and providing a wider access to knowledge helps people to ruminate more important questions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | tarun9927 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | pranav_kanth | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | vivek2upad | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | sefeliz | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | jason123 | 54 | view |
- long lasting friendships or a lot of different friends 73
- Reasons why Pterosaurs were not capable of powered flight. 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. 80
- TPO 54 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 107, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...mation to people. Internet has provided an spectacular opportunity for people to k...
^^
Line 5, column 270, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'someone'?
Suggestion: someone
...ific articles in any issue such that if some one wants to know about a specific scientif...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, likewise, may, so, still, then, therefore, thus, whereas, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2106.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 410.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13658536585 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75331178011 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529268292683 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 664.2 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 76.7491127236 60.3974514979 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.285714286 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5238095238 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.90476190476 5.21951772744 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.372085618958 0.243740707755 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10343271492 0.0831039109588 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0940439049632 0.0758088955206 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222755918411 0.150359130593 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443159192701 0.0667264976115 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 100.480337079 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.