Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of arts.
People have different views about whether a government should finance the arts or not. While some argue that it would be better for artists to protect their independence with regard to governments, I belive that governments should allocate required money in order for art to boom and for public culture to grow.
Despite all the pejorative conceptions, money is essential in any socially effective effort. A booming art is not an exception. If the officials want to have a successful art, in what meaning they assume, they should pay attention to the pecuniary aspects of the issue. For example, if a wealthy man decides to invest in a field, he would primarily consider a filed that return the most. He would not be successful in his own business in the case that he spend the money on a field that is not able to basically give back the money deposited. Thus, nobody will invest in issues like art, and consequently, art forms will stagnate. For these reasons, governments are responsible for meddling, and by supporting various art forms, help the tree of art to remain standing.
If a facet of great importance, either in personal or societal issues, has been left alone, it will be overcome by other parts of the field that are more popular but have not necessarily more depth and technical importance and richness. The governing trends are identical, as far as arts are concerned. For instance, in a state of indifference of the government, movies would emphasize features that are not artistically crucial, but brings about a positive popular attention, and thus more money for the investor. Therefore, the government should come and by investing on the kinds of art that are more rich from a technical and professional point of view keep the train of art on the right track.
However, some may posit that creativity is a pillar of art. If governments interfere in the process of developing art works, then they restrict the usual liberty required to produce a spectacular work of art. On the contrary, I, believe that they should consider that governments interfering does not oppose the innovation of artists. Artists would do the same thing as they do in regular circumstances, but the government deters violations from a upright framework. Besides, with a lack of financial support the most creative artistic forms which are not intelligible for the mundane audience will decay, and trivial art works will supplant them.
In conclusion, although some assert that governments’ meddlesome will deteriorate the prevailing creativity on the artistic society, I, personally, prefer governments to take part in financial support of art forms since it not only helps arts flourish but also enhances the cultural situation of the society.
- TPO 54 3
- Smart cars are very good because they are quick, safe, and cheap. 85
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 70
- Summarise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage. 3
- The long-term use of sucralose can cause harm to the immune system, especially in children. 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o boom and for public culture to grow. Despite all the pejorative conceptions, ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lp the tree of art to remain standing. If a facet of great importance, either i...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...p the train of art on the right track. However, some may posit that creativity ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 450, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...t the government deters violations from a upright framework. Besides, with a lack...
^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... trivial art works will supplant them. In conclusion, although some assert that...
^^^^
Line 5, column 223, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e part in financial support of art forms since it not only helps arts flourish bu...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on the contrary, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2296.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 455.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04615384615 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61852021839 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90154508723 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 215.323595506 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 717.3 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.8103514761 60.3974514979 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.842105263 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9473684211 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.36842105263 5.21951772744 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311498726596 0.243740707755 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109047384659 0.0831039109588 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0722693156776 0.0758088955206 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188769197243 0.150359130593 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0213492580669 0.0667264976115 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 100.480337079 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.