As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree, explain your reasoning. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
technology developments help us to get the answer to everything we want just by searching and surfing the internet. Although, it has benefits the main problem is that people nowadays think about their issues, reluctantly. I agree that this will surely deteriorate and this essay will be discussed the topic.
Firstly, in the past when the solution of a question was vague, individuals tried to solve it by the power of thinking. Today, everybody finds their answers just by asking google that is weakening our brains. The less solving the complex questions the less empowering the brain and it will cause several diseases in the future. Thus, the brain becomes weaker and weaker while time passes if we do not try to solve the issues by thinking.
Secondly, technology brings us various time-saving tools for finding solutions, while if we cannot search it on the net because of a lack of sufficient signals or for novel problems without any answers yet, we become confused, definitely. this is the worst time for us when we face our disabilities due to a lack of enough exercise. it is believed that the brain, as well as other muscles, should do exercises to be fit. The muscles cannot be fit if they do not be practiced properly. Therefore, using technologies will result in a less active brain and it will deteriorate.
To summarize, technology has several advantages but we should be aware that these aspects produced to make us powerful, not weak. technology affects our brain and we do not understand.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-22 | pranav_kanth | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | sefeliz | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | shuocurity | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-05 | Mridul | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-31 | chrissyready | 66 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 78
- The table shows the Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types between 2000 and 2009 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people.Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantage? 78
- The plans below show the layout of a university's sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment. Summarise the Information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Technology
technology developments help us to get the answer ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 240, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...rs yet, we become confused, definitely. this is the worst time for us when we face o...
^^^^
Line 9, column 334, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...ities due to a lack of enough exercise. it is believed that the brain, as well as ...
^^
Line 13, column 131, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Technology
...produced to make us powerful, not weak. technology affects our brain and we do not underst...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 58.6224719101 41% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1270.0 2235.4752809 57% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 257.0 442.535393258 58% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94163424125 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.55969084622 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75240057829 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 215.323595506 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583657587549 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 389.7 704.065955056 55% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.8239751573 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.7142857143 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3571428571 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.21428571429 5.21951772744 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112084131963 0.243740707755 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0408487220322 0.0831039109588 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0380132716413 0.0758088955206 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0726124418072 0.150359130593 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415846466485 0.0667264976115 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 14.1392134831 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 100.480337079 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.