As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
The issue recommends that for relying more and more on technology to solve problems, the thinking ability of humans for themselves will must deteriorate. This statement is an interesting and controversial one. This issue is increasing important in this modern age. Many people believe that technology depends on programming and programming helps to think, but these overlook the fact that only few programmers get this opportunity to enhance their thinking ability and most of the people remain idle and blindly use the technology. In my opinion, I mostly agree with the prompt and will argue supporting the prompt for following reasons .
The claim makes some certain assumptions that people only rely on technology to solve their problems. It is reasonable in this way that in near future technology will be overwhelming.
There are so many reasons for my position in this issue. However it can not be ignored that many people blindly use the technology like robots helping to make everyday food, homework etc. and thus their thinking ability to solve problems is to be reduced day by day. It is true that these technology will help to increase pleasure. But our brain is different and it is refined and developed only by thinking. If computers, mobile phones, robots etc. think instead of our brain, then we will be idle without doing any thinking.
While many professional promote the notion that technology will reduce our thinking capability, I believe opposite views should be argued. we can use technology to increase our thinking capability. There are many natural unsolved problems around us. We can find solution of these using technology. such as we can simulate big bang theory on super computer and see the results. However, technology should not be given used in such works so that they can reduce our thinking capability.
In conclusion, I have argued supporting the bad effects of technology on our thinking ability. This view will become increasingly dominant in the coming century. Many of these issue can never be solved to everybody's satisfaction, but in the long run, promoting that ubiquitous use of technology will deteriorate our thinking ability will lead to the betterment of all involved. To assess the merits of a situation or decision, it is essential to have all knowledge of all contributing factors, otherwise this kind of issue can remain unsubstantiated and open to debate.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 637, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...porting the prompt for following reasons . The claim makes some certain assumpt...
^^
Line 5, column 58, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... reasons for my position in this issue. However it can not be ignored that many people ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 284, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this technology' or 'these technologies'?
Suggestion: this technology; these technologies
... be reduced day by day. It is true that these technology will help to increase pleasure. But our...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 140, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...elieve opposite views should be argued. we can use technology to increase our thin...
^^
Line 7, column 299, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Such
...ind solution of these using technology. such as we can simulate big bang theory on s...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, so, then, thus, while, in conclusion, kind of, such as, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 33.0505617978 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2028.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 394.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14720812183 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8559946877 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510152284264 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 649.8 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 56.2383166879 60.3974514979 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.5 118.986275619 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4166666667 23.4991977007 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.21951772744 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.337171641004 0.243740707755 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0899917801404 0.0831039109588 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121179619392 0.0758088955206 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192377918705 0.150359130593 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.08986683168 0.0667264976115 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 14.1392134831 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.