Whether people follow an idea or policy is depend on situations and individual perspectives. Some people may obey to a policy because they actually agree with it while the others have to follow them even though they do not want to. Therefore, I think that it is not necessary that people who are the most deeply committed to an idea or policy are also the most critical of it.
Many people are deeply committed to an idea because they believe that the idea will benefit them in some ways. For example, some people follow the policy that prohibits them from using telephones during driving a car because they understand that the policy will make them and surrounding people safe. They understand that using the telephone will distract them from concentrating in the road environment and there will be a high risk of car accidents. These people who strictly follow this policy are not critical of it at all.
However, it is possible that, in some cases, the people who are deeply committed to an idea may be critical of it because they face many problems during following that idea. The students that are force to wear the school uniforms may have strong objection to the idea. Some of them may think that wearing the school uniforms limits their freedom to choose their own clothes and their dressing styles. In spite of this, these students still need to follow the school’s policy because they do not want to be punished. This contentious feeling tends to continue increasing as the students need to wear the uniform every day. Obviously, when people are not allowed to do what they want, their critical feeling will be very intense.
In conclusion, the opinion toward an idea is depended on what each individual person and it is not related to how this person is committed to that idea. The people may follow some ideas because they totally agree with them or because they are forced to do them without any agreement.
- "Recently, we signed a contract with the Fly-Away Pest Control Company to provide pest control services at our warehouse in Palm City, but last month we discovered that over $20,000 worth of food there had been destroyed by pest damage. Meanwhile, the Buz 72
- The following appeared in a memo to the board of the Grandview Symphony."The city of Grandview has provided annual funding for the Grandview Symphony since the symphony's inception ten years ago. Last year the symphony hired an internationally known condu 62
- "Unfortunately, in contemporary society, creating an appealing image has become more important than the reality or truth behind that image." - Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain 50
- Young people should be encouraged to pursue long-term, realistic goals rather than seek immediate fame and recognition.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for t 77
- Claim: Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today.Reason: We are not able to make connections between current events and past events until we have some distance from both.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 44, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'depended'.
Suggestion: depended
...ther people follow an idea or policy is depend on situations and individual perspectiv...
^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'also', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'still', 'therefore', 'while', 'for example', 'i think', 'in conclusion', 'in some cases', 'in spite of']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.187327823691 0.240241500013 78% => OK
Verbs: 0.198347107438 0.157235817809 126% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0468319559229 0.0880659088768 53% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0550964187328 0.0497285424764 111% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0826446280992 0.0444667217837 186% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.112947658402 0.12292977631 92% => OK
Participles: 0.0523415977961 0.0406280797675 129% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.41072453473 2.79330140395 86% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0468319559229 0.030933414821 151% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.121212121212 0.0997080785238 122% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0275482093664 0.0249443105267 110% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0247933884298 0.0148568991511 167% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1931.0 2732.02544248 71% => OK
No of words: 335.0 452.878318584 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.76417910448 6.0361032391 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.58838876751 93% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.334328358209 0.366273622748 91% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.211940298507 0.280924506359 75% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.14328358209 0.200843997647 71% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0835820895522 0.132149295362 63% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41072453473 2.79330140395 86% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 219.290929204 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.429850746269 0.48968727796 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 42.8786069619 55.4138127331 77% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6194690265 73% => OK
Sentence length: 22.3333333333 23.380412469 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.4277650985 59.4972553346 51% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.733333333 141.124799967 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 23.380412469 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.933333333333 0.674092028746 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 43.5273631841 51.4728631049 85% => OK
Elegance: 1.04918032787 1.64882698954 64% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.424775717662 0.391690518653 108% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.168677875147 0.123202303941 137% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0983526438275 0.077325440228 127% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.564480130915 0.547984918172 103% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.111879436187 0.149214159877 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.20292258423 0.161403998019 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0927915789444 0.0892212321368 104% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.443886089117 0.385218514788 115% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.00537684027999 0.0692045440612 8% => Paragraphs are so close to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.326815667012 0.275328986314 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0607676828064 0.0653680567796 93% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.4325221239 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.30420353982 94% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88274336283 20% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 9.0 7.22455752212 125% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.66592920354 136% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 13.5995575221 110% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.