People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
people should always take the decisions with practical or logical thinking rather than that of taking emotionally. practical thinking helps for future enhancement while emotional thinking only helps to solve the current scenarios.
Given statement can be explain with the strong concrete evidence of decisions which are taken by the government of our country. Ministers of our country needs to think practically before taking any decision, they have to take decision according to the perspective of common people. Furthermore, before introducing any law or taking any action they have to consider people's view, their requirements.
If government has started to think emotionally and act according to their own perspective then which will become cause to suffer common people of country. it won't affect the industrialist, actors, famous as well as rich people.
practical thinking helps to make better future. However, people needs to suffer for short period of time but which helps to enhance the future. people who takes the decision emotionally are aimless and curmudgeon. Moreover, these people are satisfied with only short term success. Therefore, people who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | AC1990 | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | lcosenza | 54 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | mrigimunjal | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | likhithae | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | yashincontrol | 50 | view |
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 33
- Highway safety13. In an attempt to improve highway safety, Prunty County last year lowered its speed limit from 55 to 45 miles per hour on all county highways. But this effort has failed: the number of accidents has not decreased, and, based on reports by 46
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
people should always take the decisions with p...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 116, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Practical
...rather than that of taking emotionally. practical thinking helps for future enhancement w...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 156, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...use to suffer common people of country. it wont affect the industrialist, actors, ...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Practical
...ors, famous as well as rich people. practical thinking helps to make better future. H...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 91, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...wever, people needs to suffer for short period of time but which helps to enhance the future. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 145, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
... but which helps to enhance the future. people who takes the decision emotionally are ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 19.5258426966 26% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 33.0505617978 30% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 58.6224719101 44% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1086.0 2235.4752809 49% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 195.0 442.535393258 44% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56923076923 5.05705443957 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 4.55969084622 82% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72569771029 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 215.323595506 54% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594871794872 0.4932671777 121% => OK
syllable_count: 335.7 704.065955056 48% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.4617318739 60.3974514979 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.5 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.25 23.4991977007 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.08333333333 5.21951772744 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.414085369461 0.243740707755 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.167579814356 0.0831039109588 202% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.255832613851 0.0758088955206 337% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235303968806 0.150359130593 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.223956615674 0.0667264976115 336% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.73 12.1639044944 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 100.480337079 51% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.