People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
Good decision making is one of the very important characteristics that should be present in a rational person. The prompt states that those people who make a decision based on their emotions followed by covering up the decision by logic are bad decision-makers. In my opinion, I strongly agree with it because of the following two reasons:
First of all, making a decision with emotion can lead to rash decision making. For example, in January 2018, prime minister of Srilanka went on to make a very poor decision by taking violent action against the civilians who were protesting against the new policy, the government had started. The prime minister later tried to cloak his action by saying that the situation was out of control and the action which was taken against the protest was the only option available to appease the situation. However, his hasty decision of the prime minister and the justification he tried to provide only exacerbated the situation. Thus, it is very important that the decision is taken by logically and not by emotion as it can lead to a poor decision.
Second of all, decision-based on emotion can lead to biased decision making. For example, last winter, the board of director meeting was set up against the three students of our college who were involved in the gang fight inside the college premise. As one of the directors was the father of one of the culprits. It was seen after the meeting came out that his son was given the least punishment as compared to the other students. It can be clearly seen that the director made a prejudiced decision as his son was the one who started the fight. The college management committee later took action against the director and immediately suspended him from his post for one month. Thus, if the director had not made the decision based on his emotion and had treated all the students equally, he would not have suffered at the end.
In conclusion, some people might say that decision based on emotion can lead to some good decision as well. However, I completely disagree with such belief as think that people who make decisions based on logic are good decision-makers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | AC1990 | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | lcosenza | 54 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | mrigimunjal | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | likhithae | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | yashincontrol | 50 | view |
- agage 16
- Pets should be treated like family members. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons to support your opinion. 61
- .In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people has a wider range of knowledge, 3
- Every school should have same curriculum . 58
- The article states that if the employees are allowed to work 4 days a week instead of 5 days a week then there will significant benefits for the company, country and as well as the individual. The author provides three reasons of support of this. However, 65
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 251, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... gang fight inside the college premise. As one of the directors was the father of ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1787.0 2235.4752809 80% => OK
No of words: 371.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8167115903 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6547771751 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 215.323595506 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.458221024259 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 565.2 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1862539674 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.6875 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1875 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1875 5.21951772744 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.477428627191 0.243740707755 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.190535400855 0.0831039109588 229% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.181069803148 0.0758088955206 239% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.368062491953 0.150359130593 245% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.15152493431 0.0667264976115 227% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 100.480337079 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.