People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
Every decision takers take risk of two things; either the decision will be propitious or it will backfire. While most people will want it to be fruitful, decision outcomes literally does depend on the factors that bounds that decision. One of the factor is the condition at which someone will be while taking it. As the statement stated most people eventually justify their decision with some logic, just like reinforcement, after seeing the outcomes. And these people are literally bad decision makers. To some extent I will agree with the fact that the outcome of decision might be justifiable, however, those decision that yield success also can be justifiable.
In justifying a bad decision, many people find themselves in a situation that is worst than they were before the decision and resulted in finding what could be the cause for the failure of the decision. Although, the justification might be well suited afterwards. For instance, a student who decide to go for an exam just because he had some family problems like he lost his Dad a day before the exam and, he knows if he eventually go for the exam the possibility of failing the exam is high. The student take that decision based on a bad emotion which if assumed he went for the exam he will be able to justify his failure with the bad decision. Nevertheless, they are always a better decision to make as regard that. The student cited above would have made the decision of not writing the exam then he would not blame himself afterwards. Thus for every emotion, it is paramount for someone to be able to control the emotion and make a better decision.
For justifying a good decision with logic can arise in some cases where the decision maker was really overwhelm with the outcome. Even though the he decision just precipitate from his mind but eventually realized it was a perfect decision. this kind decision can be found in the football settings, most especially from the coach perspectives. From the beginning of the match, every coach will their formation of team and they have maximum of three players substitute. If in the course of the game, the opponent keep pressing or one the player get injured, the coach will be lured to make decision at that instance. A decision in which some experience coach might be aware of those who will replace such player, while some might gamble player for that position. If such coach who gamble eventually won that kind match. he will feel satisfied because he made good desicion and, he will go ahead to justify such decision by using the players on every match at that position.
In conclusion, every decision can be justifiable irrespective if it is bad or good decision.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | AC1990 | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | lcosenza | 54 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | mrigimunjal | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | likhithae | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | yashincontrol | 50 | view |
- Mass media and the internet have caused people’s attention spans to get shorter. However, the overall effect has been positive: while people are less able to focus on one thing, they more than make up for it with an enhanced ability to sort through lar 66
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 54
- We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning 78
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 50
- Pirouettes Ballet School is the clear choice for any child. Of all the dance schools in Elmtown, Pirouettes has the most intensive program, and our teachers have danced in the most prestigious ballet companies all over the world. Many of our students have 29
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 527, Rule ID: AGREE_WITH_THE_FACT[1]
Message: Use simply 'agree that'.
Suggestion: agree that
... decision makers. To some extent I will agree with the fact that the outcome of decision might be justif...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 82, Rule ID: WORST_THAN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'worse'?
Suggestion: worse
... find themselves in a situation that is worst than they were before the decision and ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 204, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... cause for the failure of the decision. Although, the justification might be well suited...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 359, Rule ID: HE_THE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'like the lost'?
Suggestion: like the lost
...ust because he had some family problems like he lost his Dad a day before the exam and, he k...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 433, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'goes'.
Suggestion: goes
...the exam and, he knows if he eventually go for the exam the possibility of failing...
^^
Line 5, column 506, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'takes'.
Suggestion: takes
...f failing the exam is high. The student take that decision based on a bad emotion wh...
^^^^
Line 5, column 554, Rule ID: IF_IS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...t decision based on a bad emotion which if assumed he went for the exam he will be...
^^
Line 5, column 841, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... he would not blame himself afterwards. Thus for every emotion, it is paramount for ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 103, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'overwhelmed'.
Suggestion: overwhelmed
...ses where the decision maker was really overwhelm with the outcome. Even though the he de...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 143, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'he'?
Suggestion: the; he
...overwhelm with the outcome. Even though the he decision just precipitate from his mind...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 150, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'decisions'.
Suggestion: decisions
...lm with the outcome. Even though the he decision just precipitate from his mind but even...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 241, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...lly realized it was a perfect decision. this kind decision can be found in the footb...
^^^^
Line 9, column 762, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... might gamble player for that position. If such coach who gamble eventually won th...
^^
Line 9, column 819, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
... gamble eventually won that kind match. he will feel satisfied because he made goo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, nevertheless, really, so, then, thus, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2236.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 466.0 442.535393258 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7982832618 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64618479453 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57383731202 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.448497854077 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 706.5 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7960147627 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.636363636 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1818181818 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.31818181818 5.21951772744 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 14.0 7.80617977528 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349583355532 0.243740707755 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128676602569 0.0831039109588 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0898546870201 0.0758088955206 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231782044552 0.150359130593 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0647295817783 0.0667264976115 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.