People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 282, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ion making the output will be bad since this decisions will effect humans so their e...
^^^^
Line 1, column 302, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...t will be bad since this decisions will effect humans so their emotions and the consec...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1029, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
... logic since the output will be bad and its their responsibility so they try to fin...
^^^
Line 3, column 40, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'emotion'?
Suggestion: emotion
... I think that using logic with a little emotions to make decision is the best way a will...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 180, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'anyone'?
Suggestion: anyone
...n the decision maker will be less since any one in his position will make the same deci...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 82, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...nd no logic at all their decisions will effect them and everyone under that decision i...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 127, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a bad way" with adverb for "bad"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...t them and everyone under that decision in a bad way, also it expecteed that they will try t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, i think

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1489.0 2235.4752809 67% => OK
No of words: 327.0 442.535393258 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.55351681957 5.05705443957 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29580727541 2.79657885939 82% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 215.323595506 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.418960244648 0.4932671777 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 483.3 704.065955056 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 20.2370786517 25% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 65.0 23.0359550562 282% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 168.119719248 60.3974514979 278% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 297.8 118.986275619 250% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 65.4 23.4991977007 278% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 6.2 5.21951772744 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 10.2758426966 10% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.463938072887 0.243740707755 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.305175880757 0.0831039109588 367% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0598421211113 0.0758088955206 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.307899224059 0.150359130593 205% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.084259360215 0.0667264976115 126% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 32.7 14.1392134831 231% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 13.96 48.8420337079 29% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 27.5 12.1743820225 226% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 10.0 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 100.480337079 46% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 54.0 11.8971910112 454% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 28.0 11.2143820225 250% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 28.0 11.7820224719 238% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.