People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
The word decision can be defined as a conclusion or choice of action that is reached upon for a situation after considering the various factors that shape the situation. The fundamental definition of the term "decision" includes "consideration". This consideration means analyzing various factors, foreseeing all the possible consequences and then deciding upon a course of action that seems the most efficacious for a desired result.
Decisions when taken carefully, ensures that many of the unpredictable variables are eliminated which leads tp a path for the execution of only useful ideas that contribute positively to a decision. Similarly when decision are taken in a haphazard manner they result into situations that have various degrees of failure attached to them.For example, a simple decision of having lunch or skipping lunch can be taken by considering how hungry a person is, what did the person have for breakfast, and how long will it be before another opportunity for a meal arrives. If the person is not hungry and decides to have lunch anyway, the person might vomit or become extremely lethargic and thus preventing that person from doing the day's work.Similarly if the person decides to skip lunch altogether, he may feel hungry during his work hours which would distract him. However, if the person carefully considers the decision of of having lunch, the person might eat only a small amount to keep him going through the day without feeling hungry. It is this third scenario that is the most desirable and that person ,who carefully considers each decision available at his disposal and choosing the one most profitable, is considered a good decision maker.
Sometimes people may be emotionally influenced while making their decision. By allowing their emotions to overshadow their capability of logical thinking, they are undertaking many risks which could have been eliminated if the decision was taken logically. People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterward are bad decision makers as they lack the ability to think of the long term consequences. While their decision can prove to be beneficial in the short run, the risks of them turning bad in the long run is extremely high. For example, a couple having a fight might become frustrated and emotionally decide to call of their relationship. This, to them, might seem the solution to end the bickering fights, but in doing so they fail to analyze how much a person means to them. They can think about the decision in a logical manner in areas such as their future together, how compatible they actually are. At this stage, whatever decision they make, will be well calculated and will prevent future problems and in the future will reduce the guilt of making the wrong decision thereby proving the decision to be a correct one.
Another example would be , parents scolding their children for a mistake. Parents, out of emotional overcharge of seeing their children cry, might not correct their mistake without thinking that their children might get a wrong impression and that their mind is being molded in an incorrect manner.
People who defend their emotional decisions later with logic would provide any sort of logic to support their decision even if they know that it is wrong.If they analyze their decision before making it, it would allow them to prevent or minimize unforeseen consequences. Hence it can be affirmed that people who People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | AC1990 | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | lcosenza | 54 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | mrigimunjal | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | likhithae | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | yashincontrol | 50 | view |
- The following appears in a letter to the editor for the West Lansburg News: "The tufted groundhog lives in the coastal wetlands of West Lansburg. Ancient records suggest that the tufted groundhog once numbered in the millions. Since they were declared a w 73
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 50
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 200, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...at contribute positively to a decision. Similarly when decision are taken in a haphazard ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 234, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a haphazard manner" with adverb for "haphazard"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...sion. Similarly when decision are taken in a haphazard manner they result into situations that have v...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 338, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
...ous degrees of failure attached to them.For example, a simple decision of having lu...
^^^
Line 3, column 738, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Similarly
...ng that person from doing the days work.Similarly if the person decides to skip lunch alt...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 738, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...ng that person from doing the days work.Similarly if the person decides to skip lunch alt...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 919, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: of
...person carefully considers the decision of of having lunch, the person might eat only...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1106, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...at is the most desirable and that person ,who carefully considers each decision av...
^^
Line 5, column 857, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a logical manner" with adverb for "logical"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...them. They can think about the decision in a logical manner in areas such as their future together,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 25, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... correct one. Another example would be , parents scolding their children for a m...
^^
Line 6, column 276, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an incorrect manner" with adverb for "incorrect"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ion and that their mind is being molded in an incorrect manner. People who defend their emotional d...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 155, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: If
...sion even if they know that it is wrong.If they analyze their decision before maki...
^^
Line 8, column 272, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...nt or minimize unforeseen consequences. Hence it can be affirmed that people who Peop...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 302, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'people who'.
Suggestion: people who
...equences. Hence it can be affirmed that people who People who make decisions based on emotion and jus...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'anyway', 'but', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'similarly', 'so', 'then', 'third', 'thus', 'well', 'while', 'for example', 'sort of', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.209953343701 0.240241500013 87% => OK
Verbs: 0.192846034215 0.157235817809 123% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0730948678072 0.0880659088768 83% => OK
Adverbs: 0.049766718507 0.0497285424764 100% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0590979782271 0.0444667217837 133% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.110419906687 0.12292977631 90% => OK
Participles: 0.0668740279938 0.0406280797675 165% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.85414636762 2.79330140395 102% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0248833592535 0.030933414821 80% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.099533437014 0.0997080785238 100% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0342146189736 0.0249443105267 137% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0342146189736 0.0148568991511 230% => Maybe 'Which' is overused. If other WH_determiners like 'Who, What, Whom, Whose...' are used too in sentences, then there are no issues.
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3611.0 2732.02544248 132% => OK
No of words: 588.0 452.878318584 130% => OK
Chars per words: 6.14115646259 6.0361032391 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.9242980521 4.58838876751 107% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.372448979592 0.366273622748 102% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.284013605442 0.280924506359 101% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.207482993197 0.200843997647 103% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.127551020408 0.132149295362 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85414636762 2.79330140395 102% => OK
Unique words: 285.0 219.290929204 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484693877551 0.48968727796 99% => OK
Word variations: 59.2766472693 55.4138127331 107% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6194690265 97% => OK
Sentence length: 29.4 23.380412469 126% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.4852956908 59.4972553346 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 180.55 141.124799967 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.4 23.380412469 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.85 0.674092028746 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 13.0 5.21349557522 249% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 57.8013605442 51.4728631049 112% => OK
Elegance: 1.28350515464 1.64882698954 78% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220092106362 0.391690518653 56% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.147960407411 0.123202303941 120% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0917878506388 0.077325440228 119% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.57802023897 0.547984918172 105% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.150332739773 0.149214159877 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107265164182 0.161403998019 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.195940978242 0.0892212321368 220% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.297158431867 0.385218514788 77% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.132940064472 0.0692045440612 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161419159629 0.275328986314 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.176329015295 0.0653680567796 270% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.4325221239 58% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.30420353982 207% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88274336283 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 7.22455752212 83% => OK
Negative topic words: 11.0 3.66592920354 300% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 19.0 13.5995575221 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.