The specific aspects that contributes to greatness of a political leader is a highly contentious subject. Some claim that the greatness of a political leader is attributed by the challenges faced by that leader more than their inherent skills and abilities. Though a leader is mostly described by the challenges that they have encountered, their inherent skills and abilities are equally important when guaging the greatness and effectiveness of a politial leader.
It is without a doubt that a political leader will encounter multiple challenges throughout his or her time as a leader, but the methodology that each leader uses to engage each problem can demonstrate the effectiveness of such a leader. Political leaders that encounter a problem must used their inherent skills and abilities in which they advertise to become elected to overcome challenges effectively and swiftly. For example, a leaders faced with a challenge of taxation can utlize their skills inherited from law education prior to being elected to tackle such challenges or a leader addressing a challenge in persuading congress uses their oratory abilities for creating a cogent argument. Thus, it is true to say that a greatness of a leader based on the challenges he or she have face must also be attributed to the inherent abilities and skills used to resolve those challenges.
Though the inherent skills and abilities are important, it can be observed that most people attribute the effectiveness of a leader based on the challenges that they have faced. For example, many will recognize President Obama for his healthcare bill, which was perceived as a challenge to pass through legislation over his extraordinary oratory skills in addressing the union, but again, that is not to say, his achievements cannot be attributed to that of his skills and abilities prior to his coronation in law education
In sum, many will address the challenges leaders have faced to determine their greatness, but it cannot be denied that the inherent skills and abilities used by these leaders to tackle these challenges also have a crucial part in gauging their effectiveness and greatness.
- The perceived greatness of any political leader has more to do with the challenges faced by that leader than with any of his or her inherent skills and abilities 50
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 221, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hallenges faced by that leader more than their inherent skills and abilities. Tho...
^^
Line 3, column 431, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a leader' or simply 'leaders'?
Suggestion: a leader; leaders
...s effectively and swiftly. For example, a leaders faced with a challenge of taxation can ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 784, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...eader based on the challenges he or she have face must also be attributed to the inh...
^^^^
Line 3, column 789, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'faced'.
Suggestion: faced
... based on the challenges he or she have face must also be attributed to the inherent...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, thus, for example, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1817.0 2235.4752809 81% => OK
No of words: 347.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23631123919 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97573004705 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 215.323595506 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.417867435159 0.4932671777 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 574.2 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 20.2370786517 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 38.0 23.0359550562 165% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 142.956092715 60.3974514979 237% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 201.888888889 118.986275619 170% => OK
Words per sentence: 38.5555555556 23.4991977007 164% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.21951772744 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.441042321433 0.243740707755 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.232101338802 0.0831039109588 279% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0717853513752 0.0758088955206 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.291053690379 0.150359130593 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.094146347878 0.0667264976115 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.5 14.1392134831 159% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.45 48.8420337079 50% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 19.3 12.1743820225 159% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 100.480337079 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.2 11.2143820225 153% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.