Leaders are one of the most crucial parts of the society. The way which they achieve progress in life term is one of the most controversial between different people. The most controversial question regarding this issue is to perceive the greatness of leaders based on their abilities or the way they faced problems. From my perspective, I believe that the way leaders try to solve their problems is much more important to help them achieve progress and in what follows I will attempt to address the most discernible reasons.
First, young leaders have more enthusiasm that they old counterparts. Accordingly, they try to seize more territory-popularity regardless of their knowledge. Indeed, multiplicity of leaders who were successful, severely attempt to solve the issue regardless of their age, abilities and their popularity. 'Nader shah' the king of Iran around 500 years ago is the best example of this. Correspondingly, as he wrote in his diary, first he was in charge of small city and since he had the passion to be the king of the country, he deceived different tribes in different way such as hollow wishes or some more cruel way like killing. Therefore, even though he was not famous, but the way he persuades different leader's tribe helped him to be the king of the Iran.
Second, abilities can be more detrimental than it seems. Indeed, it acts like double- edged sword. proudness and any types of arrogant behavior impede leader's sight over his abilities and he think that with fewer army and support of ability it is easy to conquest the others. For instance, Hitler in world war II defeated by others, only because of his wrong estimation. He thought that their skill can help them to overcome Russia with more than twice of their soldiers. The misunderstanding issue that happened to Hitler was the main reason to be defeated. Conversely, Estalin, the leaders of Russia in that time, only depend on his army and tried to deal with problem only through his logic. Therefore, though that Estalin was not as popular as Hitler, but he conquered Germany.
However, there might be some types of leaders which have abilities and can handle different issues. Indeed, they are the most successful person in history of human. For example, 2000 years ago, the king of most of the world was pacific Koroush which was the leader of three fourth of the world. He was well- known and knew how to deal with different problems. He expanded his country territory from the time he was young to the time that he has died. The last conquest of his army was coincide with last year of his life. Therefore, there are some rare leaders which can have both controversial issue.
All in all, as the aforementioned examples have illustrated, I am a type of person who believe that it is more important for leaders to consider different way to deal with probable problems. Nonetheless, some leaders can have both characteristics at the same time.
- To improve the quality of education universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors 80
- TPO 45Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives.Use specific reasons and exampl 76
- Governments should spend more money in support of arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. 76
- Governments should spend more money in support of arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. 73
- TPO 30 – Integrated 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 705, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'leaders'' or 'leader's'?
Suggestion: leaders'; leader's
...ous, but the way he persuades different leaders tribe helped him to be the king of the ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 100, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Proudness
...deed, it acts like double- edged sword. proudness and any types of arrogant behavior impe...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 192, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'thinks'.
Suggestion: thinks
...leaders sight over his abilities and he think that with fewer army and support of abi...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 486, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'coincided'.
Suggestion: coincided
...died. The last conquest of his army was coincide with last year of his life. Therefore, ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, conversely, first, however, if, nonetheless, regarding, second, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 33.0505617978 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 72.0 58.6224719101 123% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2447.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 502.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87450199203 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7334296765 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75779600452 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.47609561753 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 751.5 704.065955056 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.5283931538 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.6296296296 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5925925926 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2962962963 5.21951772744 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215174119109 0.243740707755 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0614247831007 0.0831039109588 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048348256595 0.0758088955206 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126885109529 0.150359130593 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352707282147 0.0667264976115 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.