The reading states that humpback whales use stars as navigation to migrate. However, the professor refutes this point by providing three reasons of supports.
First, the article states that humpback whales use their intelligence to make conection with star for fingding their ways. The lecturer refute this points. He states that other animals like ducks can migrate by the use of stars. Even though that the intelegency of the ducks is not as the same as whales. The professor also mentions that ducks have only common intelligence and named it as instict. So, there is not any connection between intelligence and star navigation.
Second, the reading states that humpback whales use straight line for migration. However, the professor contends this point. He avers that the ability of moving through straight line does not have any connection to star navigation. The ability is a cause of bio-magnetic in which helps animals to use earth magnetic field to follow an straight line.
Finally, the article claims that abnormal behavior in humpback whales strengthen the idea of using star navigation for migration. Nonetheless, the professor casts doubt on this issue by providing an example of sharks. He mentions that sharks may also exhibit such a behavior but neither the cause of this behavior is in migration nor in star navigation. At the end of the lecture, the professor mentions that this kind of hypothesis is only pure speculation and can not be trusted.
- TPO 40 80
- TPO 02 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 65
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoni 70
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 50
- The following appeared in a memo from the director of a large group of hospitals."In a laboratory study of liquid antibacterial hand soaps, a concentrated solution of UltraClean produced a 40 percent greater reduction in the bacteria population than did t 59
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 137, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'refutes'.
Suggestion: refutes
...r for fingding their ways. The lecturer refute this points. He states that other anima...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 271, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... The ability is a cause of bio-magnetic in which helps animals to use earth magn...
^^
Line 6, column 334, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...s to use earth magnetic field to follow an straight line. Finally, the article ...
^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... speculation and can not be trusted.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, may, nonetheless, second, so, then, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.01324503311 299% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1245.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 240.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1875 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67145078666 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.504166666667 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 374.4 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.3789890908 49.2860985944 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.8125 110.228320801 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0 21.698381199 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9375 7.06452816374 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324231264134 0.272083759551 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106541264843 0.0996497079465 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0898557977807 0.0662205650399 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209811358108 0.162205337803 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00399637236466 0.0443174109184 9% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.8541721854 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.23 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 63.6247240618 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.