The reading states that new painting has been found and it cast dout on the posibility that if is it belongs to Rembrandt or not and provide three reasons of support. Nevertheless, The professor explains that the painting is a part of art from Rembrandt and oposses each of reasons in the reading.
First, the reading claims that the painting has some inconsistency to that of Rembrandt one. However the professor refutes this point. She says that maybe after a hundred year of painting, some one tried to make the color deeper by over painting some part of the painting.
Second, the reading avers that the style of Rembrandt paiting is ligth and shadow but in this painting contradicts the idea. The professor cast doubt on this point by saying that light shade has bee removed over time. She explains that simple color reflect the light and other color absorb it. so light and shadow are realistic in this painting.
Third, the passage claims that some examination has been carried out and the result reveals that the painting has been painted on some piece of wood wich is not the charicteristics of Rembrandt painting. Nonetheless, the professor oposess this point by saing that the canvas is a integrated piece of wood. She explains that large wood are more variable and the painting is composed of a single wood.
- TPO 49- Independent writingDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily. 60
- Some people have ambitious dreams and keep following them but other people always focus on realistic goals and try to achieve them Which do you think is better 75
- tpo 49 - writing 1 81
- TPO 49 - Integrated writing 75
- TPO 49 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 94, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...inconsistency to that of Rembrandt one. However the professor refutes this point. She s...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 190, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'someone'?
Suggestion: someone
...maybe after a hundred year of painting, some one tried to make the color deeper by over ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 279, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... this point by saing that the canvas is a integrated piece of wood. She explains ...
^
Line 7, column 385, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...variable and the painting is composed of a single wood.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1103.0 1373.03311258 80% => OK
No of words: 228.0 270.72406181 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83771929825 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5145123566 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 145.348785872 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.482456140351 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 317.7 419.366225166 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2960369434 49.2860985944 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.9166666667 110.228320801 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 7.06452816374 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354893163783 0.272083759551 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138390827251 0.0996497079465 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0876310918694 0.0662205650399 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228825854513 0.162205337803 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029043504549 0.0443174109184 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 53.8541721854 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.0289183223 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.42419426049 88% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 63.6247240618 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.