I totally disagree with the given claim that policies should be implemented without taking protection of environment into consideration. The environment must not be harmed by humans for their own profit. Everyone has right to live, so the environment must not be harmed.
Policies must not only focus on boosting the economy but also its focus on protecting the environment. Many animals or birds might lose their homes if there is uncontrolled cutting of trees. Every species has the right to the live the life. Due to destruction of trees, not only animals and birds lose their homes but also the small micro-organisms and the fungi which are living on these trees. So, the trees must not be cut in an uncontrolled manner.
Besides it is observed that not only lives of animals, birds, micro-organisms are disturbed but also humans are suffering. Carbon emission of various factories in consumed by the trees. If the trees are cut there is increase in the carbon-dioxide, which is very harmful for human beings. Also, the natures cycles are affected by if the environment is not protected. It is observed that nowadays there is haphazard occurrence of rainfall, which sometimes causes destruction of lives.
There is a disturbance to rich Flora and Fauna which is extremely essential for mankind and other species as well. Due damage caused to the environment the affluent nature curses and results into more destruction of not only mankind but also other species. Besides making profit is also vital. The policies that are implemented should have a blend of profit as well as the protecting environment.
So, while making policies and implementing them protection of environment must be taken into consideration and the economy should also be profited. Profit is also a very important aspect which should be taken care off.
- Policies that focuses on protecting environment should not be imposed on multinational organizations as they generate profit and boost the economy even though they cause damage to the environment 58
- The following appeared in a memorandum from administrative head of the international students activities at Rydell College To better attend to the needs of the international students being admitted to Rydell College we should build a new dining hall that 67
- Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reasons on which that claim is based CLAIM The value of integrating different disciplines in a curriculum is overestimated in the present times REASON E 50
- The following appeared in a note from a sedan owner to a friend Of the two top brands of cars introduced in past year Kia cars are clearly more superior to the competing Alfa cars Kia cars boast aesthetically pleasing design and a fuel economy of 50 kms p 50
- Because of television and worldwide computer connections people can now become familiar with a great many places that they have never visited As a result tourism will soon become obsolete
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 192, Rule ID: EACH_EVERY_NNS[1]
Message: 'Each' and 'every' are used with singular. Did you mean 'all'?
Suggestion: All
...there is uncontrolled cutting of trees. Every species has the right to the live the l...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 427, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an uncontrolled manner" with adverb for "uncontrolled"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...se trees. So, the trees must not be cut in an uncontrolled manner. Besides it is observed that not onl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Besides,
...ot be cut in an uncontrolled manner. Besides it is observed that not only lives of a...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, so, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 33.0505617978 39% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 58.6224719101 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1538.0 2235.4752809 69% => OK
No of words: 301.0 442.535393258 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1096345515 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89347982058 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 215.323595506 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.481727574751 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 704.065955056 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.4497707337 60.3974514979 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 80.9473684211 118.986275619 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8421052632 23.4991977007 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.68421052632 5.21951772744 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257537666666 0.243740707755 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0829449143483 0.0831039109588 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0775052531832 0.0758088955206 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15807716698 0.150359130593 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.071957443843 0.0667264976115 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 14.1392134831 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 48.8420337079 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 100.480337079 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.