The author seeks the evaluation of the fact that, is it really necessary to pose questions and display the urge to know the reasons behind the facts.
Many of the breakthroughs in science are as a result of curiosity and vigilant nature of a mankind. If we recall the theory provided by A, the plum pudding model, which explains the sporadic arrangement of the electrons in a nucleus. Question posed by other pioneers on what explains that specific constituents or fashion of electrons, we wouldn’t had discovered other parts of the nucleus. Questing the facts or theories can lead to even bigger discoveries.
Considering the Galileo’s theory of how the solar system is designed. Upon how all the other planets and sun revolve around the Earth. Without the interference of the intellectuals we wouldn’t be able to see the real mechanism of our galaxy. More and more queries resulted in greater inventions, the achievement of sending the first robot to space, received the more than ever high-quality image or glance to the inevitable beauty of the mars. The only questing was about how can we prove that life existed on the red sand, some billion years ago.
Questioning the authorities as to find the answer for ‘Why? How? What?’ can positively lead to the advancement of the knowledge for human kind. The unraveled facts can be buried out in need of the loopholes to be improved.
- The purpose of higher education is to prepare students for the future but classen students are at a serious disadvantage in the competition for post college employment due to the university s burdensome breadth requirements classen s job placement rate 66
- Question Authority Only by questioning accepted wisdom can we advance our understanding of the world 33
- Twenty years ago Dr Field a noted anthropologist visited the island of Tertia Using an observation centered approach to studying Tertian culture he concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 73, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Can
...o find the answer for ‘Why? How? What?’ can positively lead to the advancement of t...
^^^
Line 4, column 224, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n need of the loopholes to be improved.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, really, so, as to, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 33.0505617978 27% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1162.0 2235.4752809 52% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 236.0 442.535393258 53% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92372881356 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 4.55969084622 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83974186672 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 215.323595506 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.618644067797 0.4932671777 125% => OK
syllable_count: 354.6 704.065955056 50% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.4740240941 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.3846153846 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1538461538 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.15384615385 5.21951772744 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214783283004 0.243740707755 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0654499514984 0.0831039109588 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058813825542 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120654007761 0.150359130593 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0339382357819 0.0667264976115 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 100.480337079 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.