The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The statement given here is ambiguous. The ambiguity comes in the definition of real talent. So we will take the real talent is the musician's ability to play the different variety of things to perfection based on the conventions. To assess the talent precisely, one's fame does not play a major role in the honest assessment of the talent. It depends on the person who is assessing whether or not he is thinking objectively or subjectively. So, I disagree with the author's statement that the real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations so that his or her fame does not interfere with the honest assessment.
A musician like Mozart is very talented. To assess his talent we don't have to wait for several generations. It can be assessed by a person who is an objective thinker. If someone argues that a person can never be objective in his opinion. Then, we can say that many generations of people who not become an objective thinker. Micheal Jackson was a popular musician, an objective thinker never changed his view about him, whether he is talented or not. Similarly, for any other musician, the assessment is not related to the time when the assessment is taken. It only depends on the person doing the assessment.
Let's take an example of a musician who is very popular and is famous. If we require assessing his talent, we can certainly do with the help of testing his skill in the music.Like any other musician, we can assess his talent with a series of rounds. We will not need some generations to test the skill. Nowadays, there are many electronic devices that can also measure a person's talent.
In some cases, we may say that popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations. For instance, when the musician is very advanced for his time. In that case, people can't understand his music and thus can't accurately assess it. But if this is true then the other case can also happen that a musician is popular now but after several generations, people can't understand the music and will assess the musician incorrectly. If we take this as true, then we can never assess a person accurately.
Finally, I would like to say that whether a musician is popular or not does not have any relation with the degree of accuracy in his assessment. We can always find an objective thinker who can assess the musician without indulging in any kind of bias. Furthermore, assessing after several generations does not have any relation to objective thinking.
- Leaders are created primarily by the demands that are placed upon them. 50
- The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you a 50
- Claim: In order to help small businesses thrive, government should play a minimal role in private businessmatters. 66
- Airline industry representatives have recently argued that flying is safer than driving, citing two separatestudies. First, US statistics show that each year there are approximately 40,000 deaths in automobileaccidents versus only approximately 200 in fli 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 133, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'musicians'' or 'musician's'?
Suggestion: musicians'; musician's
... So we will take the real talent is the musicians ability to play the different variety o...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 263, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ntions. To assess the talent precisely, ones fame does not play a major role in the ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 382, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
... depends on the person who is assessing whether or not he is thinking objectively or subjectiv...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 465, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...r subjectively. So, I disagree with the authors statement that the real talent of a pop...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 66, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... very talented. To assess his talent we dont have to wait for several generations. I...
^^^^
Line 3, column 169, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...y a person who is an objective thinker. If someone argues that a person can never ...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...on the person doing the assessment. Lets take an example of a musician who is ve...
^^^^
Line 5, column 175, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Like
... help of testing his skill in the music.Like any other musician, we can assess his t...
^^^^
Line 5, column 371, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...ctronic devices that can also measure a persons talent. In some cases, we may say t...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 221, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...nced for his time. In that case, people cant understand his music and thus cant accu...
^^^^
Line 7, column 256, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ople cant understand his music and thus cant accurately assess it. But if this is tr...
^^^^
Line 7, column 408, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...w but after several generations, people cant understand the music and will assess th...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, furthermore, if, may, similarly, so, then, thus, for instance, kind of, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2145.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 447.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79865771812 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59808378696 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69926808154 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.402684563758 0.4932671777 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 702.9 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.8623837361 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.5 118.986275619 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1923076923 23.4991977007 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.03846153846 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 7.80617977528 154% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374179174803 0.243740707755 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118370710329 0.0831039109588 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126951955712 0.0758088955206 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243923317144 0.150359130593 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112076657778 0.0667264976115 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 14.1392134831 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.26 12.1639044944 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.02 8.38706741573 84% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 100.480337079 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.