The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment
The real talent of a popular musician cannot be accessed until the musician has been dead for for several years, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment. This particular statement might be true for some cases, But in recent era this statement does not holds good. Take an example of any good musician there is lets say Fredurer mercury, Eminem, Twenty one Pilot or Arijit Singh(Considered one of the best singer in India), All of these musicians have huge fan following, And whatever they compose or produce, public love them, appreciates their work. And one good point here All of them are alive (Except Fredurer Mercury - best singer of his era, while he was alive). So, I disagree with the statement made above, atleast in respect to this new era - Era of Social media, Live Concerts, Live Broadcastings and all sort of digital media platforms.
Now lets look at some of the scenarios where this statement could have hold strong ground. In the era when digital media, live concerts, live broadcasting, social media was not so popular among the common public as it is today, musicians or any other sort of artists have to struggle a lot to get their work reach to the common public, so that they can appreciate the work (if they like it). It was hard to get appreciation for good work in those times.
I will present one example in suport of the above point I have made (neccessity of digital media to get the musicican famous): On Youtube its evedent that it is easy to get more number of views and likes on the recent good work done by some of the good musicians as compare to the good work which is done long time before and now uploaded to Youtube. So, we see that its not about wether the musician is dead or alive, it is about how fast and conviniently the work will reach to the public's doorstep as soon as it is realeased.
Hence reach to the common public is as important as work being good, to get the musician famous.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 91, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: for
...cessed until the musician has been dead for for several years, so that his or her fame ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 279, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'hold'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: hold
...t in recent era this statement does not holds good. Take an example of any good music...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 279, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'hold'
Suggestion: hold
...t in recent era this statement does not holds good. Take an example of any good music...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 328, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[3]
Message: Did you mean 'there are lets'?
Suggestion: there are lets
...d. Take an example of any good musician there is lets say Fredurer mercury, Eminem, Twenty on...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 372, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: Twenty-one
...e is lets say Fredurer mercury, Eminem, Twenty one Pilot or Arijit SinghConsidered one of ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 646, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: '- the best'.
Suggestion: - the best
... them are alive Except Fredurer Mercury - best singer of his era, while he was alive. ...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 871, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd all sort of digital media platforms. Now lets look at some of the scenar...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 23, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...platforms. Now lets look at some of the scenarios where this statement could ha...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iation for good work in those times. I will present one example in suport of ...
^^
Line 5, column 237, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...d likes on the recent good work done by some of the good musicians as compare to the good w...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 367, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...now uploaded to Youtube. So, we see that its not about wether the musician is dea...
^^
Line 5, column 486, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'publics'' or 'public's'?
Suggestion: publics'; public's
...conviniently the work will reach to the publics doorstep as soon as it is realeased. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...doorstep as soon as it is realeased. Hence reach to the common public is as i...
^^
Line 7, column 3, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...orstep as soon as it is realeased. Hence reach to the common public is as import...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, look, so, while, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1601.0 2235.4752809 72% => OK
No of words: 355.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.50985915493 5.05705443957 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37894131578 2.79657885939 85% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523943661972 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 704.065955056 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 23.0359550562 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 91.1442413281 60.3974514979 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.545454545 118.986275619 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.2727272727 23.4991977007 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.63636363636 5.21951772744 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 14.0 7.80617977528 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232774247695 0.243740707755 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110806011694 0.0831039109588 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.191836120795 0.0758088955206 253% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134030522992 0.150359130593 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101011507915 0.0667264976115 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 48.8420337079 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.47 12.1639044944 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 100.480337079 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.8971910112 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 11.2143820225 132% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.