The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The claim says that the actual talent of a real musician is assessed only when the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his/her fame does not gets in the way of an honest assessment. I am not entirely in support of the claim. Yes there are a lot of examples of musicians who are treated as legends long time after their deaths but this does not means they were not appreciated for their music when they were alive.
First of all lets take the example of Beethoven, whose melodies are still one of the finest of the music of all time. Even if his music is considered legendary at present times, no one can say that his music was not appreciated during the time when he was alive. He was quite famous for his symphonies and composition during the eighteenth century when his musical career was at the heyday of it's time.
Also today, we can see the instances of some great or excellent musicians who are alive and they are treasured for their music too. No one can say that Adele doesn't have the most beautiful voice of all time or Taylor swift isn't one of the most talented singer-songwriter of today's music industry. We can also take a look at the musical talent of Lady Gaga and Micheal Jackson, they are famous because they are very good musicians, who reign on the hearts of most of the world's music lovers.
Furthermore, no one can get famous for a consistent time if they do not have true talent. We humans, today live in an era where nothing can remain hidden from the sight of media. There is no chance for any positive fame, if a musician is not talented. Many excellent singers like Chirstina Grimme, Kelly Clarkson, Sunidhi Chouhan were discovered only due to that media, which brings fame to these hidden talents and put them in the spotlight of music producers and the world alike. If they wouldn't have true talent, they don't have any chance for real fame.
Also there are so many different musicians, who represent different kind of music genres, who is to say that what is true musical talent and what is not? There are musicians like Carrie Underwood , Eminem , Katy Perry who represent different aspects and genres of music and still they rule over their music genres. Their music , for their fans is the best of it's kind. They are not dead, and yet appreciated for their music styles.
Yes there are many instances of musicians, who were admired for their musical genius after they died like Bob Marley, Amy Winehouse, but that does not mean that the real talent of a musician is only truly judged only after his/her death, when there is no fame to get in the way of real assessment. On the other hand, it shows that good musicians always stay alive in the hearts and mind of musical community. They are venerated for their contribution.
- The following appears in a letter to the editor for the West Lansburg News: "The tufted groundhog lives in the coastal wetlands of West Lansburg. Ancient records suggest that the tufted groundhog once numbered in the millions. Since they were declared a w 79
- Some young adults want independence from their parents as soon as possible, While some young adults prefer to live with their families longer. Which do you think is better? 73
- The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you 50
- Should there be an unified national curriculum throughout the country for schools? What do you think? state your claim and support with suitable examples. 58
- Provide argument against the statement of author. 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 162, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'get'
Suggestion: get
...erations, so that his/her fame does not gets in the way of an honest assessment. I a...
^^^^
Line 1, column 365, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'mean'
Suggestion: mean
...me after their deaths but this does not means they were not appreciated for their mus...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 13, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ic when they were alive. First of all lets take the example of Beethoven, whos...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...areer was at the heyday of its time. Also today, we can see the instances of some...
^^^^
Line 5, column 159, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ir music too. No one can say that Adele doesnt have the most beautiful voice of all ti...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 224, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...tiful voice of all time or Taylor swift isnt one of the most talented singer-songwri...
^^^^
Line 5, column 471, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
... who reign on the hearts of most of the worlds music lovers. Furthermore, no one ca...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 491, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
... producers and the world alike. If they wouldnt have true talent, they dont have any ch...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 522, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... If they wouldnt have true talent, they dont have any chance for real fame. Also ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... dont have any chance for real fame. Also there are so many different musicians, ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 19, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...nce for real fame. Also there are so many different musicians, who represent different kind...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 196, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...here are musicians like Carrie Underwood , Eminem , Katy Perry who represent diff...
^^
Line 9, column 205, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...musicians like Carrie Underwood , Eminem , Katy Perry who represent different asp...
^^
Line 9, column 207, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sicians like Carrie Underwood , Eminem , Katy Perry who represent different aspec...
^^
Line 9, column 328, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ule over their music genres. Their music , for their fans is the best of its kind....
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'furthermore', 'if', 'look', 'so', 'still', 'kind of', 'first of all', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.242201834862 0.240241500013 101% => OK
Verbs: 0.143119266055 0.157235817809 91% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0935779816514 0.0880659088768 106% => OK
Adverbs: 0.056880733945 0.0497285424764 114% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0642201834862 0.0444667217837 144% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.135779816514 0.12292977631 110% => OK
Participles: 0.0238532110092 0.0406280797675 59% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.34149090775 2.79330140395 84% => OK
Infinitives: 0.00733944954128 0.030933414821 24% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0862385321101 0.0997080785238 86% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0110091743119 0.0249443105267 44% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0330275229358 0.0148568991511 222% => Maybe 'Which' is overused. If other WH_determiners like 'Who, What, Whom, Whose...' are used too in sentences, then there are no issues.
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2789.0 2732.02544248 102% => OK
No of words: 503.0 452.878318584 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54473161034 6.0361032391 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73578520332 4.58838876751 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.260437375746 0.366273622748 71% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.176938369781 0.280924506359 63% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.111332007952 0.200843997647 55% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0894632206759 0.132149295362 68% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34149090775 2.79330140395 84% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 219.290929204 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.453280318091 0.48968727796 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 51.9531503082 55.4138127331 94% => OK
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6194690265 102% => OK
Sentence length: 23.9523809524 23.380412469 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.0284082348 59.4972553346 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.80952381 141.124799967 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9523809524 23.380412469 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.52380952381 0.674092028746 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.94800884956 121% => OK
Language errors: 15.0 5.21349557522 288% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 41.6462179305 51.4728631049 81% => OK
Elegance: 1.52083333333 1.64882698954 92% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333888114386 0.391690518653 85% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.128128181731 0.123202303941 104% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.111373336886 0.077325440228 144% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.567491860766 0.547984918172 104% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.146465723866 0.149214159877 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13167791317 0.161403998019 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109378003449 0.0892212321368 123% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.326504816368 0.385218514788 85% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0752700234183 0.0692045440612 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223222410944 0.275328986314 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0977472689338 0.0653680567796 150% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.4325221239 125% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.30420353982 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88274336283 82% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 7.22455752212 111% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 13.5995575221 81% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.