The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment.
Music- one of the elements that brings greater joy to life. Music is something that can be a partner you in your cheerful times, uplift you in your sad hours and even just keeps you accompanied whenever you feel like it. Musicians are people creating these beautiful melodies to keep us enamored. The prompt suggests that the real popularity cannot be tested unless the musician is dead for quite a long time and their "not being there" can infer to an unbiased judgement. To my opinion, this is not the case in most times. Either alive or dead, a person who can really connect to people will likely to have about the same level of appreciation.
To begin, creative tasks such as writing or making music or painting- these things require a certain ability of a person. Obviously, no one is equally creative. There is difference in the levels of creativity that people can achieve. Now, the people those have higher grasp on these subject-matters are likely to be higher than the mediocre people- in respect to innovation in the artistic fields. So, when we are talking about some musician or painter, it is an inherent assumption that the person is more talented than most people in this area. And talents are always appreciated whether the person is alive or dead, that too with other factors aside. For instance, Elvis Prisley- the king of pop music, had a real talent in creating some of the most iconoic songs in history. Now, although he might have some issues regarding his personal life, people loved him anyway. He reached the peak of his career very early and he truly was the king based on how people reacted to his music, even to this day. So, this illustrates that if people, to be specific, musicians, they have real talents and can touch the peoples' heart, people will bestow them with unbiased love.
Moreover, It is not the case that, a musician needs to produce constant hits to make himself a memorable person in the eye of people. There just needs to be something that can reach the people, even if it is just one song. For example, Michael Jackson produced numerous hits in his life time, making us all dance to the grooves. He created a sound completely of his own and people went crazy over him. Iconic singer Prince can be named. We can name Beatles. These are the bands or people, they have given us quality hits over the years. But when bands or singers like Blue or Daniel Powter comes up, it is usually for "that one song" they made. They have other works, sure, but that one song that made people realize how good they are, will always come on top whenever we mention their names. For instance, the first google search on their names provides the name of the work they are most notorious for. So, do people not care about them? They sure do and they are not dead yet.
Of course, people will say, in recent times, popularity is based on exposure. The more "views" someone has, the more popular she is. Is it not just proving the point here? If there were no real music or talent involved, people will not have appreciated them. Like in the case of many musicians, they were celebrated in their lifetime and they are still in the hearts of people. This has very little to do with them being gone and people being sad and sympathetic by this fact. Real talent is always appreciated.
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones. 50
- The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment. 50
- As early as the twelfth century A.D., the settlements of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico in the American Southwest were notable for their "great houses," massive stone buildings that contain hundreds of rooms and often stand three or four stories high. Archaeo 3
- In 1938 an archaeologist in Iraq acquired a set of clay jars that had been excavated two years earlier by villagers constructing a railroad line. The vessel was about 2,200 years old. Each clay jay contained a copper cylinder surrounding an iron rod. The 73
- The following appeared in a letter from the faculty committee to the president of Seatown University:A study conducted at nearby Oceania University showed that faculty retention is higher when professors are offered free tuition at the university for thei 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1110, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...hey have real talents and can touch the peoples heart, people will bestow them with unb...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 283, Rule ID: LIFE_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lifetime'?
Suggestion: lifetime
...l Jackson produced numerous hits in his life time, making us all dance to the grooves. He...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
anyway, but, first, if, moreover, really, regarding, so, still, for example, for instance, of course, such as, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 36.0 19.5258426966 184% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 73.0 33.0505617978 221% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2757.0 2235.4752809 123% => OK
No of words: 595.0 442.535393258 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63361344538 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.93888872473 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3500306128 2.79657885939 84% => OK
Unique words: 293.0 215.323595506 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.49243697479 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 868.5 704.065955056 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 6.24550561798 288% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 35.0 20.2370786517 173% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.5363699705 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.7714285714 118.986275619 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 23.4991977007 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.54285714286 5.21951772744 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 23.0 10.2758426966 224% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163426679957 0.243740707755 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0423295126634 0.0831039109588 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.044260337367 0.0758088955206 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11164892016 0.150359130593 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0213210676667 0.0667264976115 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 14.1392134831 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 12.1639044944 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 100.480337079 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.