The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment.
I doubt very strongly that the actual talent of a popular musician is not possible to be accessed until the musician has been dead for several generation, or one must be awaiting in his graveyard for hundreds of years for his/her assessment certificate. But I will go this far (and not so far) with the author: the assessment process may digress in light of the fame of the musician.
It sounds so farfetched to maintain that the musician of my grandparent’s era to be assessed in the era of my child or grandchild. The author failed to delve in many aspects before arriving at his assertion: will the musical taste remains the same for several generations? Aren’t there any genres of music that are not extant with time? Doesn’t the trend show that with every new generation, new– and rather modern – genres are created? One must be absurdly credulous, if not downright gullible, to believe that a generation will be awaiting centuries back timed musicians to idolized. Moreover, their musical taste would have been so modern, most of them might not even know/follow those musicians.
Evaluating a performer or a singer is an act that must go on with the performance of the musician; trying to assess someone with his recordings, videos or audios cannot supplant his lively performance. I have seen many singers moving from zero to hero - a roadside singer reaching the stage, a musician singing in the bus later singing in the high platform, a singer singing in front of 4 peoples reaching to millions are not new to these eyes; and most of them were bestowed with the entitlement, reverence very before their photos were bestowed with the flowers. Asha Bhosle, one of my favorites, awarded with ‘Padma vibhusan’ was officially acknowledged by the Guinness Book of World Record as the most recorded artist in music history and to the great discontent to the authors claim, she is still alive, wholesome and revered by millions of peoples.
Now, let’s have a look to the tail side of the coin – the assessment of musician might be overshadowed by the fame possessed by the author; I don’t deny it either but, it’s a deftness of the musician that bestow them with the veneration, and entitlement and the effect on it by the fame of the artist is transient; no longer can one be revered and loved as a musician on account of his fame alone if he had no dexterity as a musician.
To sum up, fame of a musician has a very transient effect and whose impact in the assessment will not last long and thus, assessment real talent of the musician does not demand his death.
- With the growth of global networks in such areas as economics and communications there is no doubt that every aspect of society including education politics the arts and the sciences will benefit greatly from international influences 79
- The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment. 83
- Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 136, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun generation seems to be countable; consider using: 'several generations'.
Suggestion: several generations
...ed until the musician has been dead for several generation, or one must be awaiting in his graveya...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, may, moreover, so, still, thus, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2168.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 452.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79646017699 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61088837703 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82386121562 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513274336283 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 681.3 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 23.0359550562 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 107.852189011 60.3974514979 179% => OK
Chars per sentence: 166.769230769 118.986275619 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.7692307692 23.4991977007 148% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.30769230769 5.21951772744 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.393163637893 0.243740707755 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134625800374 0.0831039109588 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111981808436 0.0758088955206 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24592401624 0.150359130593 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114692895988 0.0667264976115 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 14.1392134831 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.43 48.8420337079 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.1743820225 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 11.2143820225 139% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.