The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assured until a musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame fame does not interfere with honest assessment
Many a times society fails to understand the value of a talent of an artist, when they are alive. The artwork do not get recoginize and the artist dies will trying to make his or her name in the society. It is usually seen that the artwork value increases exponentially when an artist dies. Here the statement claims that the honest assessment of a musician can only be done when the musician dies. I agree with the statement and let me put fort few key factors to validate my stances.
With the help of technology it is very easy to fake a thing. With help of different software and tools available we can easily present things in our life which are totally fake. This fake life influnce principle is followed by many musician now days. They show that they music albumbs are getting millions of views online. They even show a fake life on the social media by which the younger generation is influnece. In the music albumbs more focus is kept on the money and fancy cars instead of the real music which is playing. The younger genereation gets influence by the life style of the musician and they became fans of that musician, even though the music is not very good. For instance, a musicians can hire a company which sells fake reviews and helps him in promoting the music by showing fake data with help of techonology. Here we cannot understand the real talent of the musicians.
Now a days there are many platforms for listing to music. So, a song which is catchy can get famous very easily across all this platform. The song can eaisly become the most trending song easily. From this we cannot say that the musician is talented, it could have happen that one of his song got famous due to good promotion and people listening to it. The song would not stay in trend once the people find some other song which is much better. The song could have been a trend as the musicians can make his song promote by different influencers.
I am not saying that the real talength of the musician is only assested when they die. Real talengt would always shine in the society, irrespective of gender, caste and religion. Here there many example of this in the history. In rapping industry, African-American had the monopoly for many years, but Eminem being an American earned a top position in the industry and proved every one wrong.
It is common trend in the society that the people do not vaulue the real talent of an individual when they are alive. This could be because there it is very easy to showcase a fake and a bogus lifestyle and fool people easily with help of technolgy. A real talent would only be known when a person dies as he or she can not control to what people are listing.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-22 | shubham1102 | 50 | view |
| 2023-05-22 | shubham1102 | 50 | view |
| 2023-05-22 | shubham1102 | 50 | view |
- The well being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority 50
- The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assured until a musician has been dead for several generations so that his or her fame fame does not interfere with honest assessment 61
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected However since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations we cannot permit i 60
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers 50
- An international development organization in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A While seeds for this new type of millet cost more farmers will be paid 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 8, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'times'' or 'time's'?
Suggestion: times'; time's
Many a times society fails to understand the value o...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 158, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'try'
Suggestion: try
...get recoginize and the artist dies will trying to make his or her name in the society....
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 694, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a musician' or simply 'musicians'?
Suggestion: a musician; musicians
...e music is not very good. For instance, a musicians can hire a company which sells fake rev...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: Nowadays
...and the real talent of the musicians. Now a days there are many platforms for listing to...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 5, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a day' or simply 'days'?
Suggestion: a day; days
...the real talent of the musicians. Now a days there are many platforms for listing to...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 266, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'happened'.
Suggestion: happened
...the musician is talented, it could have happen that one of his song got famous due to ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 191, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun example seems to be countable; consider using: 'many examples'.
Suggestion: many examples
... gender, caste and religion. Here there many example of this in the history. In rapping indu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 57, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd in the society that the people do not vaulue the real talent of an individual ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2199.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 490.0 442.535393258 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.48775510204 5.05705443957 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70488508055 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3482950828 2.79657885939 84% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.469387755102 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 703.8 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.8003028171 60.3974514979 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.4444444444 118.986275619 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1481481481 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.925925925926 5.21951772744 18% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187897918819 0.243740707755 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522629423538 0.0831039109588 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462656542377 0.0758088955206 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101076055269 0.150359130593 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0179082302013 0.0667264976115 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 14.1392134831 62% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 48.8420337079 144% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 12.1743820225 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.47 12.1639044944 70% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.