Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Scandals happen in almost all fields these days. They involve actions or behaviour done by someone or something which is not legally accepted by the government. Most of the scandals involve actions in which the suspect cannot be escaped from the punishment. Scandals are as important as motivational speeches, Innovational news and Reforming speeches.
Most of the scandals involve a group of people who are responsible for it and who are affected by it. Unlike the normal news scandal creates a major impact on people through which lots of awareness and safety measures are initiated by the government. Though many awareness and precautionary programs are provided by the government like women safety, Anti-bribery, sexual abuse etc., people are careless until they witness or hear about the scandal news which inturn makes them to practice precaution always.
Moreover scandals create an impact on government which results in introduction of new laws preventing further damage. Scandals do grasp our focus on it which helps people in knowing more information about current scenarios, laws and actions taken. So Scandals are useful in helping people to know about the situation and also create awareness.
'Once Bitten thrice shy'- Rather than a reformer explaining about the situation, when people face them or read about them they are more aware of it and practise caution and safety. So in my point of view, Scandals are more useful than a reformer's speech.
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be 33
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be 33
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 333, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vational speeches, Innovational news and Reforming speeches. Most of the scan...
^^
Line 3, column 414, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...use etc., people are careless until they witness or hear about the scandal news w...
^^
Line 3, column 502, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[3]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually not used at the end of a sentence.
...nturn makes them to practice precaution always. Moreover scandals create an impact...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...them to practice precaution always. Moreover scandals create an impact on government...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 236, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'reformers'' or 'reformer's'?
Suggestion: reformers'; reformer's
...f view, Scandals are more useful than a reformers speech.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, moreover, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 12.4196629213 8% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 33.0505617978 39% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 58.6224719101 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1234.0 2235.4752809 55% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 235.0 442.535393258 53% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25106382979 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 4.55969084622 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69246387202 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 215.323595506 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587234042553 0.4932671777 119% => OK
syllable_count: 384.3 704.065955056 55% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.2134374999 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.833333333 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5833333333 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.5 5.21951772744 29% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173114179311 0.243740707755 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0704378981458 0.0831039109588 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.026232419628 0.0758088955206 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107125055242 0.150359130593 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0261379186762 0.0667264976115 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 100.480337079 63% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.