Problems in our society should be highlighted to common people or brought to their attention through proper means of investigation or through a legal form of protest and not through scandals which can be detrimental to the image of the person accused and to the society before a proper study of truths.
In various democracies people are entitled to obtain information about the financial or clerical details of organizations in public domain and of governing bodies. Given such unfettered access, incidents of corruption can be determined through a legal process and the culprits can be brought to justice. To avoid this legal process and to get instant fame, some organizations specially media groups tend to use backdoor methods to get access to paperwork and vaunt about their work. Such event can also reveal confidential data that can risk the security of a nation. One such example in the Rafale fighter jet deal which is making rounds in Indian media outlets. The government argues that the documents reveal sensitive data that can put the country at risk and weaken the defence preparedness.
Some scandals which come out do not plumb the details of the case they are handling and drive improper conclusions. The ruckus created by their presenters can be detrimental to the image of the people under scrutiny. Consider a case where a video containing the leader of a nation making sensational comments about a community or their previous work, can make rounds across the social media within no time. Without proper evidence to determine the truth of such statements, the image of the leader can get tarnished beyond repair. A similar case was a morphed video generated by a sophisticated software shows president Barack Obama talking ill about Muslim community. The researchers involved in the the development have raised concerns about the impact of their work if it lands in wrong hands too.
But there are cases where scandals have enabled a common man to raise their voice where they cannot speak or voice their opinions freely. Once such example is the release of video tapes of few religious figures in India who have trapped their women devotees and use them to satisfy their sexual desires. This brought our severe outrage and has paved the way for people to challenge the atrocities of such religious figures, whom the authoritis feared to touch.
Given that the current news outlets are busy finding sensational information to improve their channel ratings, supporting such investigations can be detirmental to the society's morale and image.
- 41)Some people think that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. Do you agree or disagree with this point of view? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answe 76
- The following is a letter from the parent of a private school student to the principal of that school:Last year, Kensington Academy turned over management of its cafeteria to a private vendor, Swift Nutrition. This company serves low-fat, low-calorie meal 50
- No field of study can advance significantly unless outsiders bring their knowledge and experience to that field of study. 66
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be 66
- "Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education. Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society."Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely alig 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 170, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n or through a legal form of protest and not through scandals which can be detrim...
^^
Line 5, column 698, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
... community. The researchers involved in the the development have raised concerns about ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 698, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
... community. The researchers involved in the the development have raised concerns about ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2152.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 421.0 442.535393258 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11163895487 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68306793399 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546318289786 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 671.4 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1421918243 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.588235294 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7647058824 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 5.21951772744 19% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.097691822791 0.243740707755 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.03087482495 0.0831039109588 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0325868349705 0.0758088955206 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0598752315776 0.150359130593 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.028536395409 0.0667264976115 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.1392134831 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.38706741573 114% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 100.480337079 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.8971910112 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.