Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The claim asserts that, scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could. In the first glance, that type of claim might seems reasonable, but in deeper analysis, it is evident that, certain facts renders the claim illogical. Below, I will discuss the reasons of my stance.
Scandals are unspoken truth divulged to slander one's image, but we can not deny the fact that, not all scandals are of unquestionable truth rather sometimes deliberate vilification to degrade one's status. The role it takes is a matter of discussion, as because, scandals grabs attention of the mass public, and that is why, not all the time it can bring the good result from a motley of emotions of the general people. For instance, the scandal of extramarital relationship of Tiger Woods, disseminated in the mass media, put a bad impact in his personal life as well as his career. So, may be the scandal is possibly true, but the fact that, it can demotivate people, put them in constant pressure, hampers daily and professional life is also a matter of concern.
On the other hand, to divulge the hypocrisy of the celebrity, who are most of the time extolled by the general public because of their contrived attitude, is not a bad idea. People should know the other side of their political idol, who is making grandiloquent speech to please them and double dealing with the fate of the public. By spreading their scandals, those people would be in public pressure and will think twice before making further machination with the people. For example, the scandal of tax fraudulence by Hillary Clinton, put her in pressure and made her to capitulate before the nation for her illicit act. By those scandals, public can pressurize the person and bound them to walk in the right direction.
Lastly, to conclude, we can say that, scandals are useful in some ways to pressurize the demagogue or the celebrity with double dealing attitude to relinquish illicit acts, nevertheless, the negative impact it has on the life of a person it undeniable. So, irrelevant rumors, scandals should not be the norm to focus attention rather constructive one should be practiced to direct the right awareness to the right direction.
- All college and university students would benefit from spending at least one semester studying in a foreign country.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the posit 50
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 50
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should 50
- Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well being of the societies and environments in which they operate. Others believe that the only responsibility of corporations, provided they operate within the law, is to make as 50
- A recently issued twenty-year study on headaches suffered by the residents of Mentia investigated the possible therapeutic effect of consuming salicylates. Salicylates are members of the same chemical family as aspirin, a medicine used to treat headaches. 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 49, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... are unspoken truth divulged to slander ones image, but we can not deny the fact tha...
^^^^
Line 2, column 193, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...imes deliberate vilification to degrade ones status. The role it takes is a matter o...
^^^^
Line 3, column 104, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ho are most of the time extolled by the general public because of their contrived attitude, is...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'if', 'lastly', 'may', 'nevertheless', 'so', 'well', 'for example', 'for instance', 'in fact', 'as well as', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.233796296296 0.240241500013 97% => OK
Verbs: 0.131944444444 0.157235817809 84% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0902777777778 0.0880659088768 103% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0462962962963 0.0497285424764 93% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0532407407407 0.0444667217837 120% => OK
Prepositions: 0.127314814815 0.12292977631 104% => OK
Participles: 0.0185185185185 0.0406280797675 46% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.6909928986 2.79330140395 96% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0277777777778 0.030933414821 90% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.106481481481 0.0997080785238 107% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0324074074074 0.0249443105267 130% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00694444444444 0.0148568991511 47% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2251.0 2732.02544248 82% => OK
No of words: 383.0 452.878318584 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.8772845953 6.0361032391 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.58838876751 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.360313315927 0.366273622748 98% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.266318537859 0.280924506359 95% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.174934725849 0.200843997647 87% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.114882506527 0.132149295362 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6909928986 2.79330140395 96% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 219.290929204 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514360313316 0.48968727796 105% => OK
Word variations: 56.1366955964 55.4138127331 101% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6194690265 68% => OK
Sentence length: 27.3571428571 23.380412469 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6095942998 59.4972553346 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.785714286 141.124799967 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3571428571 23.380412469 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.674092028746 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.21349557522 58% => OK
Readability: 53.988996643 51.4728631049 105% => OK
Elegance: 1.64 1.64882698954 99% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.355314876522 0.391690518653 91% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.157410044205 0.123202303941 128% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0772776249998 0.077325440228 100% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.621984052212 0.547984918172 114% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.123860274905 0.149214159877 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.177525576234 0.161403998019 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119252617762 0.0892212321368 134% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.44839568918 0.385218514788 116% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0643200176126 0.0692045440612 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.286521198731 0.275328986314 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0988377449919 0.0653680567796 151% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.4325221239 38% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.30420353982 170% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88274336283 20% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 4.0 7.22455752212 55% => OK
Negative topic words: 9.0 3.66592920354 246% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 2.70907079646 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 13.0 13.5995575221 96% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.