Science and technology will one day be able to solve all of society’s problems.
Scientific innovation has been rapidly moving forward in the 21st century, at a pace previously unknown. This has solved a lot of current problems in society. But unfortunately, this has given rise to problems previously unknown. So although we could say with confidence that science and technology could solve existing problems with relative ease, we cannot say the same about the new problems that would arise because of new technological advancement.
In the 19th century, we had a massive change in lifestyle with the advancement in industrialization. Although it solved the previous problems such as shortage of cloths and new devices, it gave rise to new problems like bad working conditions, long working hours and unhygienic living conditions due to low paying jobs to factory workers. Industrialization is a classic example of showing how new technology can solve existing problems but gives rise to new problems.
Since the turn of the 21st century, we have had massive developments in the networks' communication domain. We have taken a giant leap in cell phone technologies which has solved a lot of previously existing problems such as instant long-distance communication. But due to this massive surge forward in cell phone technology, we have had to face newer problems like cell phone addiction, data theft, lacking social skills in the younger generation due to constant screentime. Also, with the advent of Artificial Intelligence(AI) we have solved a lot of complicated problems like weather forecasting, chatbots etcetera but we still don't know the kinds of problems that will arise due to it.
In conclusion, we can say with relative ease that with the advancement of science and technology we can be confident of solving existing problems but it would be a bit far fetched to say that science and technology will one day ne able to solve all of socital problems.
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership. 83
- Those who see their ideas through, regardless of doubts or criticism others may express, are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy. 83
- Paleo diets, in which one eats how early hominids (human ancestors) did, are becoming increasingly popular. Proponents claim our bodies evolved to eat these types of food, especially bone broth, a soup made by cooking animal bones for several hours. They 63
- Over the past three years, there has been a marked increase in cases of 'sidewalk rage,' similar to the irrational anger drivers experience on the road, but instead among sidewalk walkers. The result is an increase in assaults, property damage, 63
- Undergraduate students majoring in Business or in the Sciences should not be required to take any courses in the Humanities since those courses won’t benefit their future careers. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 77, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'networks'' or 'network's'?
Suggestion: networks'; network's
...we have had massive developments in the networks communication domain. We have taken a g...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 629, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...casting, chatbots etcetera but we still dont know the kinds of problems that will ar...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 19.5258426966 20% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1591.0 2235.4752809 71% => OK
No of words: 306.0 442.535393258 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19934640523 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10331759876 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 215.323595506 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.493464052288 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 704.065955056 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.0584997585 60.3974514979 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.583333333 118.986275619 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195481292965 0.243740707755 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0713366693339 0.0831039109588 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112941800148 0.0758088955206 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157440118732 0.150359130593 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.152682996774 0.0667264976115 229% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 100.480337079 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.