Science is meaningless without religion.
Science is an area or study of the things going on in our surroundings. It includes matter, atoms, molecules, substances that are tangible and intangible, it also analyzes the things happening around us. What are they composed of, why is something happening, what is the molecular composition of the air we are breathing and gases we are exhaling. Why do we perform certain activities related to medical terms or psychological processes. Scince is diversity and we as humans have been exploring, discovering and inventing numerous researches and scientific objects since ages. But have we ever imagined if there is some connection between science and religion? Can religion ever relate to Science? In my opinion it cannot.
Religion according to humans is a belief in a supernatural power we know as God. Religion is an aspect of believing in God, be it Hindu, Muslim, Christian, Jew or anything else. We as humans humbly accept the religion we are born in and consider it as our soul and think of an omnipotent, omniscient energy controlling us from within. So then how can religion have a role in Science? Maybe in the weather? or maybe in the things happening around us?
Long back people belived that the Apple or any fruit falling down was due to some heavenly power that wanted humans to get the fruit. Now this power was Jesus for Christians and some other God for some other religion, but later it was discovered on Scientific grounds that the Apple or any other fruit falls down on the ground was due to an unseen energy known as the gravitational energy pulling it. This energy per say pulls everything towards itself with a force, no matter how haevy the object is, it has to fall down if left un handled in free air. This scientist was the great Sir Isaac Newton and is remembered till date for his discovery. Religion had no roles to play in this and majority of us don't even know the religion to which he belonged. So religion cannot define science. It is just a perspective that drives the human thoughts
Considering the example of the great Niel Armstrong or Kalpana Chawla, the people who went to the moon. Did their religion matter when they were shortlisted for their voyage? I dont think so. There contributions to science, technology, to history and to the field of research is no less important and their religion plays no role in the records they've created and the prodigies they have been for us today. It's their work and achievement that inspires us rather than their religion or secularity which is of any concern
Hence I would like to conclude that science has all it meanings for who does it and not defined by the religion of the person associated with the science. Be it research, medicine or psychology, all that matters is the work and not the religion. A person's religion cannot ever define a person's character, brain, potential or science. It is the effort put in the science and the work performed by the individual that gives meaning to science. Similarly the belief a person has in his abilities and the super power controlling him defines religion. But to say that science is meaningless without religion cannot be bolstered.
- Men and women because of their inherent physical differences are not equally suited for many tasks 50
- The following editorial appeared in the Broomall County Times Picayune The Gordon Act which established a wildlife refuge in the Big Dark Swamp is currently up for reauthorization The act prohibits the building of roads or cutting of old growth trees in t 52
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition 50
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any ot 50
- An international development organization in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A While seeds for this new type of millet cost more farmers will be paid 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 408, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Or
... role in Science? Maybe in the weather? or maybe in the things happening around us...
^^
Line 5, column 415, Rule ID: PER_SE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'per se' (=by itself, by themselves)?
Suggestion: per se
...tational energy pulling it. This energy per say pulls everything towards itself with a ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 706, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...oles to play in this and majority of us dont even know the religion to which he belo...
^^^^
Line 7, column 179, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ey were shortlisted for their voyage? I dont think so. There contributions to scienc...
^^^^
Line 7, column 347, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they've
...r religion plays no role in the records theyve created and the prodigies they have bee...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 409, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
... prodigies they have been for us today. Its their work and achievement that inspire...
^^^
Line 9, column 2, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... secularity which is of any concern Hence I would like to conclude that science h...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 250, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...ers is the work and not the religion. A persons religion cannot ever define a persons c...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 288, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...A persons religion cannot ever define a persons character, brain, potential or science....
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 444, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...dividual that gives meaning to science. Similarly the belief a person has in his abilitie...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, similarly, so, then, as to, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 19.5258426966 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 32.0 14.8657303371 215% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 60.0 33.0505617978 182% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2629.0 2235.4752809 118% => OK
No of words: 549.0 442.535393258 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78870673953 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84053189512 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68038217889 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 276.0 215.323595506 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502732240437 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 824.4 704.065955056 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.2370786517 148% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 63.5994409479 60.3974514979 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.6333333333 118.986275619 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.26666666667 5.21951772744 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.83258426966 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300190772196 0.243740707755 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0857185689251 0.0831039109588 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118511581943 0.0758088955206 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162648669939 0.150359130593 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0990869497505 0.0667264976115 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 14.1392134831 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 100.480337079 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.