Scientist and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people.
The idea of the statement suggests that outcomes are predicted even before their complete research and what will be benefit for the people should be focused by the researchers. But this is not true in every case. I yet found somewhat convincing in the statement due to certain points given below.
Firstly, The aim of the researchers and scientists has to be somewhat aiding to social surroundings or benevolent to further some development which if happen than will be helpful to mankind, to people, to culture, to whole society or even Environment. So I think that before researching on any topic scientist and researchers has to look upon the prospect of can be achieved or accomplished at the end of the research or project. Will it be helpful to anyone significantly? Is there a need of further derivation or accomplishment which can produce benefactory to anyone involved.
Secondly, it can also be possible that the all the funding necessary to evaluate the project or research is funding by investing firms or by government organizations. In all the cases, the source of funding will desire for some fruitful accomplishment which can deliver intended prospects to the affected sources. On researching having no perfect intended goal can cost far more than the results obtained at last. If the government is funding in any case, then funds will be on account of their tax payers and government’s beneficiary incomes, In those cases, Public will be concern about on which purposes those amounts are being consumed, what are the prospective of that project. So government might be willing to address the researchers to have some concrete idea or purpose.
However it can also be possible that the innovations that can benefit the greatest can be accomplished fortuitously. Take Yahoo as example, was just inteded to provide a platform that can help people to communicate effectively and with more speed and easy via internet but afterall what turns out to be is miracle. That changed the all accomplishment prospective. Instagram was intended to serve as a navigating application but turns out to be the largest multimedia sharing platform. So this all are can be countered as to oppose the statement. But as without certain profitable aim , to research or to try to create something would be inane.
Amalgamating all in one, I found this statement cogent, though it has certain drawbacks and restrictions. One can’t be liberal about spending money which is not significantly benificiary. Even though not the accomplishment but any research, which in end, is harbinger to more significant development which can be occur after that should also be permitted but significant benefit should always be considered as pioneer to any research or project of researchers or scientists.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | shoeb_athar | 83 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | DH123 | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-28 | Jianmo | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | ken10091995 | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-30 | Mukul | 50 | view |
- Learning is primarily a matter of personal discipline; students cannot be motivated by school or college alone. 50
- Is it better for children to learn to read by using the online material or by using printed material? 56
- The council of Maple County, concerned about the county's becoming overdeveloped, is debating a proposed measure that would prevent the development of existing farmland in the county. But the council is also concerned that such a restriction, by limiting 54
- Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted, since it may be proven false in the future 50
- Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted, since it may be proven false in the future. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 151, Rule ID: IF_IS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...olent to further some development which if happen than will be helpful to mankind,...
^^
Line 3, column 613, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... will be concern about on which purposes those amounts are being consumed, what a...
^^
Line 4, column 2, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...o have some concrete idea or purpose. However it can also be possible that the innova...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 104, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...benefit the greatest can be accomplished fortuitously. Take Yahoo as example, wa...
^^
Line 4, column 123, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... can be accomplished fortuitously. Take Yahoo as example, was just inteded to pr...
^^
Line 4, column 276, Rule ID: AFTERALL[1]
Message: Did you mean 'after all'?
Suggestion: after all
...th more speed and easy via internet but afterall what turns out to be is miracle. That c...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 586, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...t. But as without certain profitable aim , to research or to try to create somethi...
^^
Line 5, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...omething would be inane. Amalgamating all in one, I found this statement coge...
^^
Line 5, column 51, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ting all in one, I found this statement cogent, though it has certain drawbacks ...
^^
Line 5, column 368, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... after that should also be permitted but significant benefit should always be con...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'firstly', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'then', 'as to', 'i think', 'in any case']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.192 0.240241500013 80% => OK
Verbs: 0.192 0.157235817809 122% => OK
Adjectives: 0.074 0.0880659088768 84% => OK
Adverbs: 0.052 0.0497285424764 105% => OK
Pronouns: 0.018 0.0444667217837 40% => OK
Prepositions: 0.104 0.12292977631 85% => OK
Participles: 0.056 0.0406280797675 138% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.1226807337 2.79330140395 112% => OK
Infinitives: 0.052 0.030933414821 168% => OK
Particles: 0.004 0.0016655270985 240% => OK
Determiners: 0.098 0.0997080785238 98% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.044 0.0249443105267 176% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.024 0.0148568991511 162% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2805.0 2732.02544248 103% => OK
No of words: 456.0 452.878318584 101% => OK
Chars per words: 6.15131578947 6.0361032391 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62105577807 4.58838876751 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.375 0.366273622748 102% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.315789473684 0.280924506359 112% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.232456140351 0.200843997647 116% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.149122807018 0.132149295362 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1226807337 2.79330140395 112% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 219.290929204 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.482456140351 0.48968727796 99% => OK
Word variations: 54.4330178143 55.4138127331 98% => OK
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6194690265 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.7142857143 23.380412469 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.734614206 59.4972553346 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.571428571 141.124799967 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7142857143 23.380412469 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.666666666667 0.674092028746 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.21349557522 192% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 53.2932330827 51.4728631049 104% => OK
Elegance: 1.34351145038 1.64882698954 81% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326717101439 0.391690518653 83% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0980788239743 0.123202303941 80% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.059279114662 0.077325440228 77% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.529177257763 0.547984918172 97% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.159635843763 0.149214159877 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119247587141 0.161403998019 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0823760433478 0.0892212321368 92% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.375419548828 0.385218514788 97% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.058293858117 0.0692045440612 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22799624378 0.275328986314 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468150693999 0.0653680567796 72% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.4325221239 125% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.30420353982 38% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88274336283 123% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 7.22455752212 97% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.66592920354 27% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 13.5995575221 81% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.