Scientists and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people.
The world has witnesses many inventions, some were great, some were significant and some were not so visible. It is well known, that the greatest of the inventions were focussed on the most needed human problems and they have benefitted the majority of the population. Be it the invention of Alternating Current, which took Tesla 40 years of dedicated research or be the evolution of mobile phones. In the light of the proposed recommendation, I agree that the Researchers should focus their research on areas that are most beneficial to the majority of the people.
Let's take an instance of one of the greatest inventions of all time, the wheel. In ancient era, people used to cover lengths of distance because of no means of transportation. This resulted in the loss of physical tenacity as well as a significant amount of time. The whole manking benefitted with the invention of the wheel. Though the people who invented it may not be technically termed as scientists or reseachers but they did play a vital role in solving one of the toughest problem statements surrounding the human life. The wheel of the modern era has evolved enormously and is made up of a lot of alloys and is almost used in each and every means of transportation, be it bullet trains or cars.
Apart from this, let's navigate our focus onto the medical research. Flipping through the pages of medical history, one can easily notice that the medicine industry has always addressed the most widely spread diseases, which has affected the majority of the population. Be it the reseach for polio, or cancer medications. Now, let's assume that the entire creamy layer of scientists or researchers cease to work on medications for cancer, AIDS or any other disease whose medication is not that prevalent in the society and is also, not cent percent effective but instead, shift their focus entirely on some rare disease which has infected only a handful of people. That would certainly not pay off well for the major portion of the human race.
Similarly, let's talk about the research in the field of communication. The world has witnessed the remarkable transformation from a wired landline phone to a dual screen dual SIM light weight mobile handset with 24*7 connectivity to the internet. The evolution of data from 2G to 3G, 3G to 4G and soon from 4G to 5G technology, has touched almost every other field of research that has benefitted almost every person on this planet. Be it an driver, whose only source of income is based on driving a car for an APP based company (like Uber) with the help of another company, that helps him navigate (Google), both making use of high speed data connectivities or be it a data scientist who is working on determining the shape and size of a black hole.
However, research in the fields of space science and missions for inter planetory life, doesn't directly benefit most of the human race as far as the present needs are concerned. But, one can simply not overlook the importance in research in these areas given the fast depletion of Earth's natural resources, due to various factors including overpopulation.
In the end, it's true that the scientists/researchers must have a vision and a foresight for the needs of human civilzation that might be visible in the future, but the majority of the focus should be in line to the current needs and requirements, which would benefit the majority of the human population.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | shoeb_athar | 83 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | DH123 | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-28 | Jianmo | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | ken10091995 | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-30 | Mukul | 50 | view |
- In a recent survey of more than 5,000 adolescents, the teens who reported eating the most meals with their families were the least likely to use illegal drugs, tobacco, or alcohol. Family meals were also associated with higher grades, better self-esteem, 69
- The best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people whom they lead. 83
- Our team has completed its research on suitable building sites for a new HobCo hobby Shop in the city of Grilldon. We discovered that there are currently no hobby shops in southeastern Grilldon. When our researchers conducted a poll of area residents, 88 86
- Nosinia is an herb that many users report to be as effective as prescription medications at fighting allergy symptoms. Researchers recently compared Nosinia to a placebo in 95 men and women with seasonal allergies to ragweed pollen. Participants in the st 69
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...eficial to the majority of the people. Lets take an instance of one of the greatest...
^^^^
Line 4, column 180, Rule ID: LIGHT_WEIGHT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lightweight'?
Suggestion: lightweight
...andline phone to a dual screen dual SIM light weight mobile handset with 24*7 connectivity t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 440, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...most every person on this planet. Be it an driver, whose only source of income is ...
^^
Line 5, column 89, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... and missions for inter planetory life, doesnt directly benefit most of the human race...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, similarly, so, well, apart from, as to, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 82.0 58.6224719101 140% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2840.0 2235.4752809 127% => OK
No of words: 589.0 442.535393258 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82173174873 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.92639038232 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82678994762 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 297.0 215.323595506 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504244482173 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 896.4 704.065955056 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 81.4480643728 60.3974514979 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.090909091 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7727272727 23.4991977007 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.86363636364 5.21951772744 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278400827397 0.243740707755 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0724063472466 0.0831039109588 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0920248344849 0.0758088955206 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136854641492 0.150359130593 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0577840105312 0.0667264976115 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.1392134831 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 140.0 100.480337079 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.