Scientists and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The vortex of the assumption of the argument is that scientists and researchers and their innovations should be beneficiaries towards the societies. I personally agree with the statement and provide examples to bolster my stance.
First of all, scientific innovations and researches are indications of prosperity or advancements in the education, health-care and quality of its people's lifestyle. The countries which use science to benefits its people developed than other counties. From the early days of humanity, scientific innovations have been discovered to solve the mundane problem in our societies. For example, to solve mass transportation cars and other facilities had been developed. To tackle the diseases penicillin and other drugs had innovated.
In the field of telecommunication and earlier problem-solving telephone and computer had innovated. Science and researchers always work on the focus of the zestiest of the era and its problems. Scientific researches were conducted in various fields not only medication or technologies but also in agriculture and other regular problems. For example, in the field of agriculture organic fertilities and seed had introduced. To tackle the virus, the gene mutation of the seeds had been done.
Peoples may argue that many scientific experiments had done without the vision of human benefit and innovation should be independent. Innovations like space exploration do not directly benefit us, but space could be used as the other source of rare materials, as the source on the earth is limited, and space could be used as a habitat of peoples because of overpopulations.
At the epilogue of the topic, I would say that, if the science research and it's innovation does not work in favor of society and people the effects were abysmal. For example, when science used in personal benefit or in gain the strength it creates war and the results were atom bomb and the missiles or guns used in a war. Science used in adverse effects of benefits the society, but the same things could be used in favor of humans, like a nuclear reactor or to provide electricity. So, used the science on benefit has a better effect on society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-30 | Mukul | 50 | view |
| 2019-08-22 | Nikita Goel | 66 | view |
| 2019-06-15 | SOUMEDHIK | 83 | view |
| 2019-06-02 | dsbp15 | 66 | view |
| 2019-05-26 | fa1salahm3d | 58 | view |
- Issue: the luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals. 50
- TPO-09 - Integrated Writing TaskCar manufacturers and governments have been eagerly seeking a replacement for the automobile's main source of power, the internal-combustion engine. By far the most promising alternative source of energy for cars is the hyd 73
- TPO-10 - Independent Writing TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- Only once has known real sadness can one feel true happiness. 50
- The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 478, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'diseases'' or 'disease's'?
Suggestion: diseases'; disease's
...ities had been developed. To tackle the diseases penicillin and other drugs had innovate...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, for example, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 14.8657303371 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 33.0505617978 42% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1830.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 352.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19886363636 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06824494885 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511363636364 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 584.1 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.163959006 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.666666667 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5555555556 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11111111111 5.21951772744 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136306318295 0.243740707755 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0459573597367 0.0831039109588 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0396962540894 0.0758088955206 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0834993327442 0.150359130593 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371833215676 0.0667264976115 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.