Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take.
The vast historical records of the evolutionary process on planet earth would totally agree with the fact that the fittest and the most adaptable survives and thrives in this race of evolution, and clearly the mere existence of 14,000 years on this planet for Homo Sapiens, a.k.a, humans have no say whatsoever in this process.
We learn the examples of extinction of Dinosaurs who vanished in a fraction of a second and left their crocodile brothers behind, just because they had adapted to live inside water, and thus survived that global catastrophe. The existence of the great white bear in Antarctica is one such recent case. There were no white bears until one genetically mutated white bear was born. To his shear serendipity, the white surroundings of Antarctica were ideal for him to hunt and feed, and this gave him an advantage over black peers to survive which finally led to extinction of black bears from Antarctica.
In all these examples the human hand was minimal and it was impossible for the society to deal with it no matter what. But examples like these are not the exhaustive list of cases where humans had no hand. Take a case of tigers in Asia Pacific region. The heinous and vast scale killings of tigers left them to the point of extinction. But the better part is, they realized their mistakes and things are improving ever since then.
Though I would agree that society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities, but the hypothesis is flawed as it is very difficult to find the human hand because of lack of all the aspects that need to be considered as an influence. For an example, we have no idea how our radio technology is impacting different species, and can potentially lead them to extinction. It's hard to evaluate the quantifiable impact of human activities right now that could affect the future of any species, and that’s exactly why our society, no matter how much determined to, but cannot roll back the impact of their activities. So thought society should, ideally, make efforts to save the species endangered as a result of human activities, but there is no prevention to this disease, just cure.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-21 | Himanshu Sharma | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | Manoj Gyawali | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | Manoj Gyawali | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-09 | harshit kukreja | 54 | view |
| 2019-12-07 | Caveira meyona | 62 | view |
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 58
- TO UNDERSTAND THE MOST IMPORTANT CHARACTERSTICS OF A SOCIETY, ONE MUST STUDY ITS MAJOR CITIES. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 87, Rule ID: AGREE_WITH_THE_FACT[1]
Message: Use simply 'agree that'.
Suggestion: agree that
...y process on planet earth would totally agree with the fact that the fittest and the most adaptable surv...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'finally', 'if', 'second', 'so', 'then', 'thus', 'as a result']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.218527315914 0.240241500013 91% => OK
Verbs: 0.140142517815 0.157235817809 89% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0902612826603 0.0880659088768 102% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0546318289786 0.0497285424764 110% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0451306413302 0.0444667217837 101% => OK
Prepositions: 0.12351543943 0.12292977631 100% => OK
Participles: 0.0237529691211 0.0406280797675 58% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.604333328 2.79330140395 93% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0356294536817 0.030933414821 115% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.116389548694 0.0997080785238 117% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0166270783848 0.0249443105267 67% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0190023752969 0.0148568991511 128% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2238.0 2732.02544248 82% => OK
No of words: 384.0 452.878318584 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.828125 6.0361032391 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.58838876751 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.3125 0.366273622748 85% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.2421875 0.280924506359 86% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.166666666667 0.200843997647 83% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.114583333333 0.132149295362 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.604333328 2.79330140395 93% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 219.290929204 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.48968727796 115% => OK
Word variations: 64.4734479019 55.4138127331 116% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6194690265 68% => OK
Sentence length: 27.4285714286 23.380412469 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 90.4912894669 59.4972553346 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.857142857 141.124799967 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4285714286 23.380412469 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.571428571429 0.674092028746 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 51.6473214286 51.4728631049 100% => OK
Elegance: 1.52475247525 1.64882698954 92% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.517848413032 0.391690518653 132% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.130999522167 0.123202303941 106% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0628042385041 0.077325440228 81% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.566486764026 0.547984918172 103% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.195812694687 0.149214159877 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.210443231874 0.161403998019 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122200197534 0.0892212321368 137% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.349991781077 0.385218514788 91% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0467425686613 0.0692045440612 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.342147424083 0.275328986314 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0917396587178 0.0653680567796 140% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.4325221239 77% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.30420353982 94% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88274336283 20% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 6.0 7.22455752212 83% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.66592920354 82% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 2.70907079646 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 9.0 13.5995575221 66% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.