Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.
There exists millions of species of animals and plants which constitutes our total ecosystem. And with the course of time, whether caused by human activities or not, many of these species is being jeopardized. The issue above states, people should merely act to thwart its extinction only if the species are endangered by them. but a clear examination reveals that, as these are a part of the society, authority must protect them whether or not they are being affected by the society itself because of two reasons.
Firstly, since all the fawns and fauna are essential constituents of the ecosystem, more or less, we are implicitly dependent upon their existence. For any of the variety is on the verge of diminish, gradually they will affect the balance of the ecosystem. For example, in a forest, the main predator of the herbivorous deer, the carnivorous tiger lives on preying the deer. In case of any natural calamity, if the number of deers starts to decrease, potentially it will severely have profound influence over the tigers. Subsequently, the voracious tigers will go for another prey, otherwise they will die, thereby imbalaning the system. So we have to be very cautious about the decrease of any species.
Moreover, a myriad number of trees are extant from another milieu. these trees act as a connection of us with the past. archaeologists are being able to extract profuse information of the prehistoric period from the parts of the trees. but, in case, once that species is eradicated from the earth, it is almost impossible to retract those species in laboratory, which in many cases, can be proved to be a panacea of a particular disease. therefore, these should be preserved for our own interests
some might argue that, since human activities are not responsible for some of the varieties' elimination from our biodiversity, why should we become pensive about their maintenance. it definitely sound ridicule, because sooner or later, humans will also lament for not lionizing about their extinction. therefore, we must be meticulous about saving any of the species we get informed of.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-21 | Himanshu Sharma | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | Manoj Gyawali | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | Manoj Gyawali | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-09 | harshit kukreja | 54 | view |
| 2019-12-07 | Caveira meyona | 62 | view |
- Young people are better decision-maker than mature ones. 73
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities. 50
- " Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks. "Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, 70
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos 79
- In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay inorder to do so. A mandatory policy requiring companies to offer their emplo 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 329, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
... if the species are endangered by them. but a clear examination reveals that, as th...
^^^
Line 1, column 431, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...he society, authority must protect them whether or not they are being affected by the society ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 68, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...f trees are extant from another milieu. these trees act as a connection of us with th...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 121, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Archaeologists
...ct as a connection of us with the past. archaeologists are being able to extract profuse infor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 237, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...ric period from the parts of the trees. but, in case, once that species is eradica...
^^^
Line 5, column 250, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...om the parts of the trees. but, in case, once that species is eradicated from the...
^^
Line 5, column 440, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...o be a panacea of a particular disease. therefore, these should be preserved for our own ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...ld be preserved for our own interests some might argue that, since human activitie...
^^^^
Line 7, column 71, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...uman activities are not responsible for some of the varieties elimination from our biodiver...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 83, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'varieties'' or 'variety's'?
Suggestion: varieties'; variety's
...ies are not responsible for some of the varieties elimination from our biodiversity, why ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 182, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...become pensive about their maintenance. it definitely sound ridicule, because soon...
^^
Line 7, column 196, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'sounds'?
Suggestion: sounds
... about their maintenance. it definitely sound ridicule, because sooner or later, huma...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 303, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...r not lionizing about their extinction. therefore, we must be meticulous about saving any...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, therefore, for example, in many cases, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1763.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 349.0 442.535393258 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05157593123 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79826384381 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578796561605 0.4932671777 117% => OK
syllable_count: 570.6 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3563760051 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.705882353 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5294117647 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64705882353 5.21951772744 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 13.0 7.80617977528 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 10.2758426966 19% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172305296995 0.243740707755 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.04954721664 0.0831039109588 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0668516321893 0.0758088955206 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105565250367 0.150359130593 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0742676721417 0.0667264976115 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.