Local communities typically support a wide variety of projects to help serve the daily needs and desires of their members. The prompt mentions youth sports leagues, which serve recreational purposes, while charities are of immense social significance. Other projects may include those involving sanitisation (cleaning up the local river, so that the community may benefit from the convenience of having a nearby source of water, or a place for water sports), or tree-planting, to increase foliage and improve air quality. There might even be more technical projects involving coming up with novel techniques to battle pestering issues like pollution, or strategies to incentivise people to reduce wastage of food. I believe that an appropriate mix of volunteers and professionals is best suited for most projects, in general.
Volunteers are highly devoted to their tasks, as is already evident from the fact that they do not seek monetary compensation. Their enthusiasm is fuelled by a bonafide desire to ameliorate the condition of the society. In projects such as tree plantation or blood donation campaigns, they play an instrumental role in 'spreading the news' amongst community members, keeping them informed, and inspiring and encouraging them to participate. Their being relatable to the common man helps the cause, since people can empathise; they can almost effectovely serve as rle models. The dedication of a volunteer towards sustainable development can help motivate the masses to rethink the cause they themselves live for, and to join the force, affecting a positive change on the society. Operationally, volunteers are light on people's pockets, again since profit is not their motive.
On the other hand, certain tasks may require economic planning, or knowledge of human psychology. Such fields often require years of education and expertise. A project which aims to deal with issues seen as sensitive amongst conservative folks, such as LGBTQ+ rights, would need careful planning. The public will need to be educated, but it shouldn't turn up against the very governing body. Medical expertise would be essential when dealing with health-related issues, such as in AIDS awareness camps. A doctor would also be more trusted by the people than a mere volunteer, in this case. Excercising appropriate penalties in order to minimise food wastage may well require the assistance of a trained economist. Coming up with an efficient way to create hand sanitisers would require cooperation with professional engineering institutes. In such cases, the assistance offered by a professional would turn out to be invaluable. The financial downside of employing professionals, as opposed to employing volunteers, is that it may tend to burn a hole in a disgruntled taxpayer's pocket.
I believe that the community can function optimally only when a mixed group of professionals and volunteers work together to achieve the common good. Suppose donations need to be collected to fund the fight against polio. Doctors, in such a case, would be essential when educating the people about polio vaccines. Efficient vaccination drives would be best planned out by trained managers. The outreach could be boosted with the assistance of volunteers. Besides putting up posters, the latter could even be trained to administer the vaccines. The cooperation of all would finally ensure management of polio.
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 50
- Some believe that local communities should rely on citizen volunteers for projects benefiting those communities e g organizing youth sports leagues and collecting donations for charity Others believe that local communities are better served when professio 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 342, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...public will need to be educated, but it shouldnt turn up against the very governing body...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, if, may, so, thus, well, while, in general, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 12.4196629213 193% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 78.0 58.6224719101 133% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2875.0 2235.4752809 129% => OK
No of words: 531.0 442.535393258 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4143126177 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80035803286 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00284951379 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 304.0 215.323595506 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572504708098 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 894.6 704.065955056 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.0587943811 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.678571429 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9642857143 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.53571428571 5.21951772744 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 10.2758426966 195% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178208153564 0.243740707755 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0394844351585 0.0831039109588 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.056004120757 0.0758088955206 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115517484828 0.150359130593 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0967974243006 0.0667264976115 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.38706741573 113% => OK
difficult_words: 167.0 100.480337079 166% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.