Some people believe that college students should consider only their own talents and interests when choosing a field of study. Others believe that college students should base their choice of a filed of study on the availability of jobs in that field.
“To be employed or to be I interested, that’s a question.” There may be no college student who is free from this question. Most students have difficulty determining whether they should follow their talents and interests or seek for job opportunities. Take, for example, the issue at hand here. What is a priority for students to choose their studies? Talents and interests? I think that following students’ talents and interests is wiser for students. Thus, I agree with the former position.
Of course, job opportunity is very important for students. After graduation, they should make their livings independently and their jobs decide the quality of their lives. When a stable income is guaranteed, they are more likely to enjoy their lives and make a happier family.
However, it is a mistaken idea that following one’s interests and talents means the loss of good job opportunities. Rather, it might be able to help students find good job opportunities. This is because a good job opportunity is a produced by not only characteristics of study but also high grades. For example, if a student majored in a disciples related with AI industry but his grades were very low, it is unlikely to lead to good job opportunities. On the other hand, if a student did not study pragmatic disciples but she had very high grades, it is more likely to lead to good job opportunities. This example shows that students can study what they want to study, not giving their job opportunities.
In addition, college students can draw their future through other ways than acquiring their jobs after graduation. Entering graduate schools also is a way for college students to manage their lives after graduation. A few students make an effort to walk on the road of scholar. Our professors are the representative example of this case. They chose to turn their academic talents and interests into great researches and papers containing many insights which can contribute the development of academia. This example shows that students can make their great lives also by continuously focusing on their studies instead of getting good jobs.
I admit that choosing between pursuing talents and interests and seeking for employment is a very difficult but inevitable challenge. However, I want to say that the benefit of studying what students want to study outweighs the benefits of seeking employments, and it can open the door of new possibility to walk on the road of scholars.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-23 | Nanggyu Park | 67 | view |
| 2022-10-26 | mkm462 | 60 | view |
| 2022-10-01 | ZHOU0444 | 70 | view |
| 2022-09-26 | Mufaddal Rangwala | 50 | view |
| 2022-09-04 | Sujan Adhikari | 50 | view |
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 337, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a disciple' or simply 'disciples'?
Suggestion: a disciple; disciples
...s. For example, if a student majored in a disciples related with AI industry but his grades...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, thus, for example, i think, in addition, of course, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2070.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 408.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07352941176 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91863502538 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.490196078431 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 630.9 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 6.24550561798 256% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.6443167994 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.25 118.986275619 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 23.4991977007 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.21951772744 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334778117218 0.243740707755 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106154359019 0.0831039109588 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0706264891897 0.0758088955206 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192075845199 0.150359130593 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0499003991536 0.0667264976115 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 14.1392134831 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 11.8971910112 42% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 337, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a disciple' or simply 'disciples'?
Suggestion: a disciple; disciples
...s. For example, if a student majored in a disciples related with AI industry but his grades...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, thus, for example, i think, in addition, of course, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2070.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 408.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07352941176 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91863502538 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.490196078431 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 630.9 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 6.24550561798 256% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.6443167994 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.25 118.986275619 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 23.4991977007 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.21951772744 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334778117218 0.243740707755 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106154359019 0.0831039109588 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0706264891897 0.0758088955206 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192075845199 0.150359130593 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0499003991536 0.0667264976115 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 14.1392134831 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 11.8971910112 42% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.