Some people believe that college students should consider their own talents and interests when choosing a field of a study. Others believe that base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field.
It has always be problem how to choose a suitable major for some freshmen especially for those who do not have a clear plan of the future. Some people argue that college students should take talents and interests into consideration when they choose a major. Some other people suggest that the availability of jobs in that field should be put into the first place. While my stance aligns more closely with the former, there are some differences between them.
It may benefit both the society and the individuals when students choose their majors based on the availability of jobs. As is often the case, the more easily we can get a job in a field, the more urgently the society needs it. A particularly salient example is the computer science. A student from the computer science department can easily get a decent job with a salary up to 15,000 RMB in China which is much higher than that of most majors even if he just graduates from the university. And he can live a rather comfortable life with this salary. What is more, the modern society which can not develop without computer science needs talents of computer science urgently. Famous companies like HuaWei and Alibaba even hold competitions in this field with a huge amount of money as the prize up tp 1 million RMB and they also offer extremely well-paid positions for these winners. In return, these companies also have a rapid development in the fields related to computer science. For instance, HuaWei has been the pioneer of the 5G technology with the most patents, which is the next generation of communication technology. And the artificial intelligence (AI) of Alibaba has been first-class in this world though China started late in this field, which has been combined with other fields and has brought tremendous amount of breakthroughs like driverless cars and facial recognition. These example illustrate that it benefit both sides when students choose study of the field in view of the job availability because it suits supply demand relationship.
However, interest as the best tutor of study and talents decide how long we can stay in a field and how well we can do in this field. There are so many living example that students who just hates math choose the artificial intelligence because of its good career prospects finally end up with withdrawal from universities or dismissal from companies. Even if they can really find a high-salary job, he will not be happy to be tolerant with a disgusting field for so many years. And students like Feynman who chose an unpopular field like theoretic physics at his time out of interest could also be a legend and had a comfortable life. Even if most scientists can not compare with Feynman, they can also enjoy the pleasure of explaining this world by physics. These examples show that if we really want to pursue the happiness in spirit, we had better take interests and talents into consideration when choosing a field of study.
Indeed, these two suggestions do not necessarily exclusive with each other. As is often the case, we usually have many different fields which we are interested in. We can choose one field or related field which has a good career prospect and we are interested in.
To sum up, my stance that students can balance the interest and the job availability with of course interest put into the first place aligns more closely with the first statement.
- Universities should require every student take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study. 66
- Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers. 66
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their national state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain. 70
- People's behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making. 66
- Formal education tends to restrain our minds and spirits rather than set them free. 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 15, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
It has always be problem how to choose a suitable major ...
^^
Line 9, column 96, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s decide how long we can stay in a field and how well we can do in this field. Th...
^^
Line 13, column 115, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
.... As is often the case, we usually have many different fields which we are interested in. We c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, may, really, so, well, while, for instance, of course, to sum up, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.3162921348 186% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 71.0 58.6224719101 121% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2830.0 2235.4752809 127% => OK
No of words: 582.0 442.535393258 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86254295533 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.91168771031 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64750930334 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 268.0 215.323595506 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.460481099656 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 887.4 704.065955056 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8221476855 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.2 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.28 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.52 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306346418174 0.243740707755 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.094968678019 0.0831039109588 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0830548974987 0.0758088955206 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180958355604 0.150359130593 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0564061094441 0.0667264976115 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 100.480337079 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.