Government funding arts is necessary for the development of arts and make it reach all people. However, the funding threatening the integrity of arts is not necessary. Investment in arts promotes traditions and the cultural value of any state or a country in whole.
Firstly, investment in art would encourage more artists and attract tourists to the country. For example, Washington Dc has many tourists not only because it is the capital city but also has a wide range of museums like National gallery of art. This would indeed contribute to the country’s economy and also helps to preserve the traditions of the country. The development of art will result in excellence, innovation, professional development and integrity in the field of arts. In the present world, with the increase in contemporary art, it is difficult for this field to burgeon without the backup from the government.
Secondly, appreciation of art should not be confined only to the affluent class of the society who can effort expensive painting. An art is more appreciated when it reaches to all classes of public. If we take a look at the European art, the painting of profound artists like Da vinci are open to public thus, the people enjoy class museums, galleries. This cannot be achieved without the help of the government.
One may argue that government-funded art projects can bias against artists who dissent the current situation. A modern artist almost has to be critical towards his or her contemporaries to create any artwork remotely interesting or meaningful. For example, if you take away the anger towards the communist regime in Ai Wei Wei's art, it becomes lifeless and pointless. A government sure should not have a say on what an artist produces, or what opinions they voice. However, this is not necessarily at odds with the presence of government funding in art. Being aware of this potential danger, we only need a carefully-regulated and relatively independent committee to assess the funding opportunities. Moreover, the presence of government funding does not eliminate artist's opportunities to get funded by international dealers, just like in the case of Ai Wei Wei.
In sum, the government help is required for art to flourish and in return helps the country development and preserve the culture and traditions.
- Zoos are sometimes seen as necessary but not poor alternatives to natural environment. Discuss some arguments for and /or against keeping animals in zoo. 56
- Science is meaningless without religion.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should conside 87
- People's behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting 50
- In order to produce successful original work, scholars and scientists must first study the successful work of others to learn what contributions remain to be made. 62
- "College students-and people in general-prefer to follow directions rather than make their own decisions. Therefore, colleges should eliminate as many choices as possible in order to offer students clear direction." 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 856, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: Wei
...al dealers, just like in the case of Ai Wei Wei. In sum, the government help is requ...
^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d preserve the culture and traditions.
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'firstly', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'moreover', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'thus', 'as to', 'for example']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.288095238095 0.240241500013 120% => OK
Verbs: 0.111904761905 0.157235817809 71% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0761904761905 0.0880659088768 87% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0595238095238 0.0497285424764 120% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0261904761905 0.0444667217837 59% => OK
Prepositions: 0.12380952381 0.12292977631 101% => OK
Participles: 0.0119047619048 0.0406280797675 29% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 3.06943086209 2.79330140395 110% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0285714285714 0.030933414821 92% => OK
Particles: 0.00238095238095 0.0016655270985 143% => OK
Determiners: 0.119047619048 0.0997080785238 119% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0214285714286 0.0249443105267 86% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0119047619048 0.0148568991511 80% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2330.0 2732.02544248 85% => OK
No of words: 380.0 452.878318584 84% => OK
Chars per words: 6.13157894737 6.0361032391 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.58838876751 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.376315789474 0.366273622748 103% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.321052631579 0.280924506359 114% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.228947368421 0.200843997647 114% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.144736842105 0.132149295362 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06943086209 2.79330140395 110% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 219.290929204 92% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531578947368 0.48968727796 109% => OK
Word variations: 58.7602738786 55.4138127331 106% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6194690265 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.380412469 81% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.0381424193 59.4972553346 50% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.5 141.124799967 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 23.380412469 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.75 0.674092028746 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.21349557522 38% => OK
Readability: 51.1052631579 51.4728631049 99% => OK
Elegance: 2.14457831325 1.64882698954 130% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.570022689622 0.391690518653 146% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.113783896474 0.123202303941 92% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0911088274528 0.077325440228 118% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.553984019222 0.547984918172 101% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.170673167018 0.149214159877 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.235176940712 0.161403998019 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116280413259 0.0892212321368 130% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.423046182227 0.385218514788 110% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0669003893932 0.0692045440612 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.397522250359 0.275328986314 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0899985123166 0.0653680567796 138% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.4325221239 125% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.30420353982 113% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88274336283 20% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 10.0 7.22455752212 138% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 13.5995575221 110% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.