Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.
Art has attained a contemporary definition of something abstract and hobby practiced by rich people only. To understand the insight of author's statement we need to get familiar with "what is art truly?", only then it is possible to help flourish and preserved arts. Art is something abstract not only practiced by rich people instead can be practiced by any people whether rich or poor, young or old, educated or not. Anyone from any place and any time can be an artist. Art is pure, has no boundary. To help flourish support from government is not necessarily against the integrity of art, since art needs to have freedom from both society and government. This can be clarify by few example.
Firstly, art is something that comes naturally as talent. Anyone can have that talent to do something artistic. However, there is many people who lacked opportunity to show their talent. unprivileged Street dancer waiting their whole life to get an opportunity to showcase their talent; talented magician performed in street looking for a platform to blown the audience's mind. These people could have used the support from government to get a platform to perform, get an opportunity to showcase their talent. Government fund to arts can ensure these unprivileged people an opportunity.
Secondly, now a days everything is measured by how much money can be earned for surviving; and art losses at it all. People from poor background whose are passionate about art having hard time keeping their passion as profession. Since, working in an industry or any other firm provide more money and security to get paid in time in a steady way. These people has to support their family, sometimes they are the only earning member in the family. A friend of mine used to sing folk song, came from poor family, sacrifice his passion for singing because hsi family needs financial support from him to survive. This reality of life dissuade him from his passion about arts. Therefore, government funding in arts surely help these talented people to continue practicing their passion.
However, some people disagree with this in an extant that, those provide money always have tendency to get control of, create boundary, but art is something that can not be bound. Government funding lead the authority to force arts in a profitable way, those who loves to create abstract paintings might be forced to draw social life on demand, which is not his/her interest zone. Therefore, government funding circumscribe arts.
To conclude, government funding is necessary for arts to ensure flourishment and availability to people, however it may circumscribe arts itself.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-10-17 | blenksprado | 83 | view |
- Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in orderto thrive, because it is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved andgenerated. 50
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts. 83
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could. 16
- Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership. 78
- Scandals-whether in politics, academia, or other area-can be useful. They focus our attention onproblems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could. 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 679, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun example seems to be countable; consider using: 'few examples'.
Suggestion: few examples
... and government. This can be clarify by few example. Firstly, art is something that come...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 188, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Unprivileged
...acked opportunity to show their talent. unprivileged Street dancer waiting their whole life ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 11, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: nowadays
...ged people an opportunity. Secondly, now a days everything is measured by how much mone...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 331, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a steady way" with adverb for "steady"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... money and security to get paid in time in a steady way. These people has to support their fami...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 361, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'have', 'haven'.
Suggestion: have; haven
...d in time in a steady way. These people has to support their family, sometimes they...
^^^
Line 7, column 233, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a profitable way" with adverb for "profitable"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...unding lead the authority to force arts in a profitable way, those who loves to create abstract pai...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'firstly', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'as to']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.261316872428 0.240241500013 109% => OK
Verbs: 0.191358024691 0.157235817809 122% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0740740740741 0.0880659088768 84% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0452674897119 0.0497285424764 91% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0349794238683 0.0444667217837 79% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0946502057613 0.12292977631 77% => OK
Participles: 0.0514403292181 0.0406280797675 127% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.66568924008 2.79330140395 95% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0534979423868 0.030933414821 173% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0781893004115 0.0997080785238 78% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0205761316872 0.0249443105267 82% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0164609053498 0.0148568991511 111% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2646.0 2732.02544248 97% => OK
No of words: 436.0 452.878318584 96% => OK
Chars per words: 6.06880733945 6.0361032391 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56953094068 4.58838876751 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.380733944954 0.366273622748 104% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.300458715596 0.280924506359 107% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.199541284404 0.200843997647 99% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.128440366972 0.132149295362 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66568924008 2.79330140395 95% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 219.290929204 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509174311927 0.48968727796 104% => OK
Word variations: 57.710913241 55.4138127331 104% => OK
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6194690265 116% => OK
Sentence length: 18.1666666667 23.380412469 78% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8664710056 59.4972553346 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.25 141.124799967 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1666666667 23.380412469 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.541666666667 0.674092028746 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.21349557522 115% => OK
Readability: 48.2125382263 51.4728631049 94% => OK
Elegance: 1.5 1.64882698954 91% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.417954175125 0.391690518653 107% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.140367267219 0.123202303941 114% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.115699940267 0.077325440228 150% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.470493644062 0.547984918172 86% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.18403541856 0.149214159877 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136254788395 0.161403998019 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0874704314598 0.0892212321368 98% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.280878475565 0.385218514788 73% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0244521903283 0.0692045440612 35% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.283891353834 0.275328986314 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0488977317581 0.0653680567796 75% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.4325221239 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.30420353982 57% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88274336283 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 14.0 7.22455752212 194% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.66592920354 27% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.5995575221 118% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.