Some people believe that government officials must carry out the will of the people they serve. Others believe that officials should base their decisions on their own judgment.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
The government officials are recruited to serve the people of the nation. They have to carry out the tasks that can bring long term benefits to the community. There is an ongoing debate about the roles of the officials. According to the prompt, this debate is polarized into two distinguished opinions: one group claim that while serving for the people, they ought to preserve the will of the people, whereas other argue that it should be based on their own intrinsic and judgement. In my opinion, I think that government officials have to keep in mind the requirements of the lay people, nonetheless, their own judgements should also be reflected in their decisions. I will explain my position with three specific reasons.
First of all, the administrative persons are nominated by the vote of the country people. They cast vote for them to get their rights properly. If the selected officials start neglecting peoples' requirements, it will create a negative impression among the citizens. Eventually, they may start riots and chaos in the society. For example, when the Myanmar president Su-chi was selected by the people, they hoped that she would serve their rights at the first place. Later they discovered that, they were repudiated in my ways including suffrage or establishing an egalitarian society. Consequently, they started protest against her and at the end Su-chi had to go to jail for abolishing the rights of the country people. This incident clearly demonstrates that if the needs of the people are not prioritized at the first place, the stability and sovereignty of the nation will be altered. Therefore, to make a country free from violence as well as perturbations and embrace peace, the officials must serve the necessities of the general mass.
Furthermore, decisions based on judgement may induce biasness and partiality. Whenever an administrative person gets the opportunity to make a decision based on his own verdict, he might favor the actions that bolster his positions such as economic development or positional improvements. For example, recent studies have demonstrated the drawbacks of bureaucratic societies where the bureaucrats can make and change the own laws based on their needs. Since they are authorized to make decisions as their own, they often use it for their own accomplishments and let the general people suffer. In this connection, it can be stated that personal judgement should never second the greater will of the nation.
Nonetheless, it can't be denied the self-appraisal before making a decision even if it is for the purpose of the nation. Since, many of the requirements by the denizen are not well suited or vague, it is certainly the responsibility of the government people to assess them first. For example, the people of China once wanted to attempt Nuclear weapon attack to India to get back the border area between China and India. However, the Chinese government didn't make this happen and wisely handled the matter. Hence, it can be affirmed that, will of the people can be served but after critically evaluating them.
To summarize, although many people prefer one stance over another as the prompt highlighted, I personally feel that the government officials should make them complementary instead of selecting one over another. That means, will of the people are exhorted to serve with the help of critical judgement by the hired administrative personnel.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 17, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...will of the nation. Nonetheless, it cant be denied the self-appraisal before mak...
^^^^
Line 7, column 17, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'cants'?
Suggestion: cants
...will of the nation. Nonetheless, it cant be denied the self-appraisal before mak...
^^^^
Line 7, column 452, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... India. However, the Chinese government didnt make this happen and wisely handled the...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 609, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d but after critically evaluating them. To summarize, although many people prefe...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, nonetheless, second, so, therefore, well, whereas, while, for example, i think, such as, as well as, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 33.0505617978 172% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2877.0 2235.4752809 129% => OK
No of words: 558.0 442.535393258 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15591397849 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.86024933743 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90838792808 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 282.0 215.323595506 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505376344086 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 889.2 704.065955056 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 21.0 6.24550561798 336% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4955216666 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.555555556 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.21951772744 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.83258426966 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28608591783 0.243740707755 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0776890087475 0.0831039109588 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588197260651 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165912172054 0.150359130593 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0522118958566 0.0667264976115 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 140.0 100.480337079 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.