Some people believe it is imperative for individuals living in developed nations to reduce their energy consumption and lead a more sustainable lifestyle, given the evidence for global climate change. Others believe that such drastic lifestyle changes are unwarranted, based on the existing evidence for global climate change.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
Many people argue that the inhabitants of the most developed nations should take seriously into account the problem of the global climate change by changing their lifestyle in order to provide benefits to our planet's health. On the other side of the argument, many people believe that the alarmism is too high and that such drastic change will be impossible to put into actions. At a first glance, I tend to mostly agree with the former view but, analyzing more deeply the scope of the argument also the opinion of the latter should be taken into consideration.
In the latest time, we have heard more and more evidence about the climate change and how it is affecting the health of the planet and many campaign of awareness has been done. We all know that the argument is clearly supported by many scientific research and that we have the need to do something in order to improve the situation. However, just few serious measures have been take by the governments to limit this situation and they are not enough to stop the negative trend. For this reason, especially in the most industrialized countries, more strict laws have to be made by the governments, and some practical suggestions have to be divulgated to raise awareness the citizens to a correct and eco-friendly behaviour.
On the other side of the argument, imposing laws that would change the everyday life dramatically would be just a waste of time. As a matter of fact, it is impossible to ask people to leave the benefits gained from industrialization aside. Suppose for example that the government impose a law which asks citizens to stop using the washing machine in order to cut down the CO2 emission. Of course nobody would be caring about it and many critics will spread out because everybody does not want to lose the benefits in terms of time-consuming and difficulty of the labor of the automatic washing. All this is to say that, even if there is a clear need to create some new restrictions, this ones must be reasonable in order to be respected by everybody and to provide real benefit to the environment.
In conclusion, it is even more clear that something has to be done in order to avoid the deterioration of our planet, but we have to find the right way to gain the results wanted. We have to act on both law and awareness side, in order not only to introduce some rules that must be respect, but also to make people understand how their individual behaviour and their small actions are able to change the overall mindset. Therefore, the laws that will be made must be well-reasoned in order to, on one side, reduce the energy consumption while boosting the more sustainable ones and, on the other side, avoid a sharp change in people's lifestyle, that would be compromising the success of the policy implementation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-06 | Technoblade | 66 | view |
| 2022-09-05 | Jeet Thkaur | 66 | view |
| 2022-08-29 | bhavna288 | 50 | view |
| 2021-08-29 | ulligadda sreeja | 50 | view |
| 2021-08-29 | ulligadda sreeja | 50 | view |
- The Electoral College was one of many compromises that grew out of the U S Constitutional Congress in 1787 The framers of the Constitution considered several options for electing a president such as direct election by the people and election by the House 3
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food It is therefore necessary for government to impose a higher tax on this kind of food To what extent do you agree or disagree with 61
- Write about the following topic Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or 67
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary 75
- Universities should require students to take courses only within those fields they are interested in studying Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 136, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun campaign seems to be countable; consider using: 'many campaigns'.
Suggestion: many campaigns
... affecting the health of the planet and many campaign of awareness has been done. We all know...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 232, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[4]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun research seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much scientific research', 'a good deal of scientific research'.
Suggestion: much scientific research; a good deal of scientific research
...at the argument is clearly supported by many scientific research and that we have the need to do somethi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 684, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...r need to create some new restrictions, this ones must be reasonable in order to be ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, therefore, well, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, of course, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 79.0 58.6224719101 135% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2322.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 489.0 442.535393258 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74846625767 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70248278971 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74350602899 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 215.323595506 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492842535787 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 754.2 704.065955056 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 23.0359550562 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.9553496031 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.8 118.986275619 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.6 23.4991977007 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.26666666667 5.21951772744 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210374058079 0.243740707755 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0692255609852 0.0831039109588 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0711824354082 0.0758088955206 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128834013605 0.150359130593 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0684732016032 0.0667264976115 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 14.1392134831 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 48.8420337079 97% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 11.2143820225 132% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.