Some people believe that in order to be effective, political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principles for the sake of compromise.
Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently committed to particular principles and objectives.
To some extent, I agree with the author’s opinion. However, the author extends the opinion to an extreme, which can not be reversed while overlooking other compelling factors that are likely to affect the issue. On balance, my point of view and deep analysis are as follows.
In a sense, I would admit this assertion that leaders should commit to their principles and objectives. Although the assertion has some obvious mistakes, it has some advantages when applied to the description of specific cases, which is incontrovertible because the cases are rational in the context of our daily experience. The principles and objectives of the leaders are to realize their social responsibilities. When leaders stick to their principles, it is to the benefit of solving social problems. For example, people have always been divided on gender equality. Most people firmly believe that men and women are not equal, but others do not. Although most people want to influence leaders’ opinions that men and women are not equal, leaders should persist in their principles. Only if they stick to their principles, they can work together to resolve the dispute, like the enactment of laws requiring equality between men and women, and promote the development of society. Thus, it is improper for leaders to yield to the public. They need to keep their commitment to their principles.
For society, leaders commit to their principles that can promote the development of society and earn the trust of the public. It is during the epidemic time that leaders stick to their principles and prompt the organization of medical rescue operations. The order of stopping work, stopping production and people not going out without necessity were quickly issued. Although many people think it is not apposite to let them stay at home, the dangers of the epidemic prove it right. Leaders make the right decisions in a short time and stick to their principles will earn the trust of the public. And the public will coordinate leaders’ work next time.
Leaders need to stick to their principles, but they also need to listen to some public opinions. Because one of the responsibilities of the leader is to serve the public, they need to adopt properly the public’s opinion to understand what they need.
In conclusion, the issue of whether leaders need to commit to their principles or adopt the public’s opinion is a complex one, requiring subjective judgment. Consequently, there are no easy or certain answers. So different are the personal experiences and emotional concerns among people with a diverse culture that a thousand individuals might hold a thousand opinions. According to me, I think leaders should commit to their principles.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-24 | WangYing | 58 | view |
| 2022-06-10 | Meet0963 | 50 | view |
| 2021-08-20 | himanshukmr234 | 66 | view |
| 2021-08-20 | himanshukmr234 | 66 | view |
| 2020-11-22 | Lane7777 | 79 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 476, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'rights'?
Suggestion: rights
...e, the dangers of the epidemic prove it right. Leaders make the right decisions in a ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 372, Rule ID: ACCORDING_TO_ME[1]
Message: This phrase can sound awkward in English. Consider using 'in my opinion' or 'I think'.
Suggestion: In my opinion; I think
...viduals might hold a thousand opinions. According to me, I think leaders should commit to their...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, look, so, thus, while, for example, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2293.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 445.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15280898876 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81504067166 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489887640449 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 695.7 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.3551507386 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.72 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.84 5.21951772744 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25211128975 0.243740707755 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0804927996855 0.0831039109588 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574477079067 0.0758088955206 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136061903792 0.150359130593 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373690885628 0.0667264976115 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.