Some people believe that in order to thrive, a society must put its own overall success before the well-being of its individual citizens. Others believe that the well-being of a society can only be measured by the general welfare of all its people.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
It is obvious that the overall success of the society is important; however, it depends on the situation that how much it is going to cost and how much it is going to hurt normal people. On my opinion, welfare of the people should become before overall accomplishment of the society.
If economic growth is going to interrupt citizens welfare, it does not wroth at all. Imagine factories those produce high quality of products to sell and make a good profit which make economic development for the society. At the same time, they might discharge all the pollution to a river close to people’s houses which is not good because later or sooner most of the residents on that area need to move somewhere else against their wills. Thus, this is not a good example of economic success.
Additionally, victory in Wars is impressive when it won’t make normal people hard. When the government only care about success in War and not welfare of the people, general citizens will get in trouble. When the government spends all the nation money on weapons and military families what will happen to normal people. They will be hungry with no food, so obviously this is not a moral way to earn the victory.
However, some people might say that sometimes it is impossible to bring happiness to every citizen life. For example, it is really good that low-income families can have free or cheap health insurance and food stamps in California. But there are still many homeless in different parts of the California who will always suffer from the poverty even if the government spend all money for them. That cannot be an excuse for the government to refuse to put people’s comfort prior to the society accomplishment.
The overall achievement of the society is good under conditions of not hurting normal people. As a conclusion, people well-being must be more important than society achievement.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-19 | okazaki11 | 50 | view |
| 2023-03-11 | ramaand | 62 | view |
| 2022-09-25 | raghavchauhan619 | 83 | view |
| 2022-09-25 | raghavchauhan619 | 83 | view |
| 2022-09-25 | raghavchauhan619 | 83 | view |
- Although innovations such as video computers and the Internet seem to offer schools improved methods for instructing students these technologies all too often distract from real learning Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree 58
- Some people believe that our ever increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction Other people believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with one another Write a resp 50
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporti 50
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporti 58
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporti 54
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, really, so, still, thus, well, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1569.0 2235.4752809 70% => OK
No of words: 322.0 442.535393258 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87267080745 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63335175992 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565217391304 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 704.065955056 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9831806202 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0625 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.125 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.21951772744 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239016439951 0.243740707755 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0783268080656 0.0831039109588 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0809235402271 0.0758088955206 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139760743852 0.150359130593 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0827772563288 0.0667264976115 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 100.480337079 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, really, so, still, thus, well, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1569.0 2235.4752809 70% => OK
No of words: 322.0 442.535393258 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87267080745 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63335175992 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565217391304 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 704.065955056 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9831806202 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0625 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.125 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.21951772744 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239016439951 0.243740707755 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0783268080656 0.0831039109588 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0809235402271 0.0758088955206 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139760743852 0.150359130593 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0827772563288 0.0667264976115 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 100.480337079 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.