Some people believe that society should try to save every plant and animal species, despite the expense to humans in effort, time, and financial well-being. Others believe that society need not make extraordinary efforts, especially at a great cost in money and jobs, to save endangered species.
Scientists are now mutating mosquitoes’ DNA to balk the destruction of birds on Hawaiin islands caused by avian malaria; the U.S government spends millions of dollars every year to protect endangered species such as the rhinoceros, and the wild tigers; a plethora of organizations around the world are set up for the conservation of the jeopardised flora and the fauna. Clearly, an abundance of money and time is involved in the preservation of plant and animal species—especially the endangered ones. The question arises : Is this investment worth it? Is it justified?
First of all, there are numerous medical benefits that plants and animals offer : Rosy Periwinkle, a plant endemic to Madagascar, and which is now on the verge of extinction, possess anti-cancer substances; leeches are now employed in surgery for their anti-coagulant properties; the pharmaceutical industry makes thousands of medicines from plants. Imagine the useful plants, that are endangered, become extinct. There would be disease and death of the human race.
Secondly, out of the 80,000 species of plants, only 20 contribute to the 90% of the world’s food. Conserving and using the plants that are not utilized can feed the increasing population.
Moreover, if one plant/animal becomes extinct, it can disturb the network of the flora and the fauna called as biosphere which consists of various ecosystems. Ecosystems purify the air, detoxify and decompose wastes, they help in regeneration of soil fertility. These are of importance to agricultural, and pharmaceutical companies —worth trillions of dollars annually.
Wildlife watching and recreation at the parks and zoos generate billion of dollars in economic benefits to the nation. The returns are hundred times more than the investment. And who has given us the right to destroy plants and animals? Every creature has an intrinsic value and has its place on this planet. Elephants and rhinos, for instance, are killed by poachers for their ivory and horns respectively. Exterminating plant and animal species not only reduces our benefits but it’s morally wrong.
All in all, if we want to treat people suffering from diseases like Leukaemia, Parkinson’s, if we want the agricultural and industrial enterprises to keep generating money, or if we want this world to be a better place to live, there is one thing we should all do : save the endangered species. We need the Rosy Periwinkle, the rhinoceros, the vipers : Economy-wise, recreation-wise and medicinal value wise.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | jason123 | 58 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | Kutumba kasyap | 83 | view |
| 2019-11-20 | maneesha ch | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-02 | tulipkatie | 66 | view |
| 2019-07-28 | Shivgovind | 55 | view |
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain. 16
- Some people believe that society should try to save every plant and animal species, despite the expense to humans in effort, time, and financial well-being. Others believe that society need not make extraordinary efforts, especially at a great cost in mon 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 128, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
... islands caused by avian malaria; the U.S government spends millions of dollars e...
^
Line 9, column 65, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...creation at the parks and zoos generate billion of dollars in economic benefits to the ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 136, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...benefits to the nation. The returns are hundred times more than the investment. And wh...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'if', 'moreover', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'for instance', 'such as', 'first of all']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.277777777778 0.240241500013 116% => OK
Verbs: 0.14 0.157235817809 89% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0666666666667 0.0880659088768 76% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0355555555556 0.0497285424764 71% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0311111111111 0.0444667217837 70% => OK
Prepositions: 0.104444444444 0.12292977631 85% => OK
Participles: 0.0377777777778 0.0406280797675 93% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.17897782314 2.79330140395 114% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0244444444444 0.030933414821 79% => OK
Particles: 0.00222222222222 0.0016655270985 133% => OK
Determiners: 0.106666666667 0.0997080785238 107% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00888888888889 0.0249443105267 36% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0133333333333 0.0148568991511 90% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2531.0 2732.02544248 93% => OK
No of words: 400.0 452.878318584 88% => OK
Chars per words: 6.3275 6.0361032391 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.58838876751 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.38 0.366273622748 104% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.3225 0.280924506359 115% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.235 0.200843997647 117% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.165 0.132149295362 125% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17897782314 2.79330140395 114% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 219.290929204 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5925 0.48968727796 121% => OK
Word variations: 71.5388375101 55.4138127331 129% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6194690265 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.380412469 86% => OK
Sentence length SD: 96.0372844264 59.4972553346 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.55 141.124799967 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 23.380412469 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.5 0.674092028746 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.94800884956 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.21349557522 58% => OK
Readability: 52.25 51.4728631049 102% => OK
Elegance: 2.03225806452 1.64882698954 123% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25719949256 0.391690518653 66% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.106563299791 0.123202303941 86% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0743921580599 0.077325440228 96% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.554347452194 0.547984918172 101% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.197206264585 0.149214159877 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101644556482 0.161403998019 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0530261076181 0.0892212321368 59% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.350410743367 0.385218514788 91% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0679959446789 0.0692045440612 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16568616727 0.275328986314 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324122007392 0.0653680567796 50% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.4325221239 105% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.30420353982 113% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88274336283 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 7.22455752212 83% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 13.5995575221 96% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.