Some people believe that society should try to save every plant and animal species, despite the expense to humans in effort, time, and financial well-being. Others believe that society need not make extraordinary efforts, especially at a great cost in money and jobs, to save endangered species.
The speaker males a threshold claims that many extinctions in the past were due to nature disasters, and then conclude that human should not spend money and time for safeguarding species. While I wholeheartedly agree with the threshold claim, the conclusion unfairly generalizes that we should not protect species. I strongly believe that we cannot compare this age with the past, as well as our survival depends on the nature.
To illustrate my position, let us to take a look why the author’s conclusion is wrong. It is quite normal that was not any relic of human in the billion years ago, and surly; human had not any role of extinction in that time. Likewise, eliminating some animals could not make life difficult for human. However, our survival depends on the other creatures, and extinction species can put us in the dangerous situation. I think that a small example can give some light to this topic. After industrial revolution, development medical science assists people to live longer, and increase their population. Hence, human needs more animals, which were their foods. So, modern human has more connections with the environment, and every nature disaster more effective than the past.
A further point we must consider is that human activities have a great destructive role on the nature. After extinctions on billion years ago, the nature had enough time to allow new creatures to evolve, while the scenario is different in the modern age. Nowadays, human activities have so acceleration that the nature cannot provide a suitable environment for creating new species. Recent researches show that about 90 percent of forests all over the world will be destroyed soon. In this way, if humans do not pay more attention for preserving the nature and species, sooner or later, we will be an only creature on the Earth for ever.
All above evidence supports this undeniable fact that human activities are more destruction than the nature catastrophic and the nature now is so weak that it cannot reconstruct itself. Last but not least, I hope that people gain the deeper insight that the nature is not just for theirs, and it also belongs to next generations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | jason123 | 58 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | Kutumba kasyap | 83 | view |
| 2019-11-20 | maneesha ch | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-02 | tulipkatie | 66 | view |
| 2019-07-28 | Shivgovind | 55 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Telephones and email have made communication between people less personal. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 83
- Films can tell us a lot about the country where they were made. What have you learned about a country from watching its movies? Use specific examples and details to support your response. 79
- Jazz music is extremely popular in the city of Monroe over 100 000 people attended Monroe s annual jazz festival last summer and the highest rated radio program in Monroe is Jazz Nightly which airs every weeknight Also a number of well known jazz musician 58
- A recent study reported that pet owners have longer, healthier lives on average than do people who own no pets. Specifically, dog owners tend to have a lower incidence of heart disease. In light of these findings, Sherwood Hospital should form a partnersh 70
- Every generation of people is different in important ways How is your generation different from your parents generation Use specific reasons and examples to explain your answer 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s our survival depends on the nature. To illustrate my position, let us to tak...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...isaster more effective than the past. A further point we must consider is that...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... only creature on the Earth for ever. All above evidence supports this undenia...
^^^
Line 7, column 331, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd it also belongs to next generations.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'likewise', 'look', 'so', 'then', 'well', 'while', 'i think', 'as well as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.214111922141 0.240241500013 89% => OK
Verbs: 0.12895377129 0.157235817809 82% => OK
Adjectives: 0.121654501217 0.0880659088768 138% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0827250608273 0.0497285424764 166% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0462287104623 0.0444667217837 104% => OK
Prepositions: 0.109489051095 0.12292977631 89% => OK
Participles: 0.0121654501217 0.0406280797675 30% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.70545577072 2.79330140395 97% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0194647201946 0.030933414821 63% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.104622871046 0.0997080785238 105% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0267639902676 0.0249443105267 107% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00729927007299 0.0148568991511 49% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2202.0 2732.02544248 81% => OK
No of words: 363.0 452.878318584 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.06611570248 6.0361032391 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.58838876751 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.34435261708 0.366273622748 94% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.253443526171 0.280924506359 90% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.181818181818 0.200843997647 91% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.126721763085 0.132149295362 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70545577072 2.79330140395 97% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 219.290929204 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575757575758 0.48968727796 118% => OK
Word variations: 65.8374125377 55.4138127331 119% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6194690265 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.1666666667 23.380412469 86% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3137901908 59.4972553346 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.333333333 141.124799967 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1666666667 23.380412469 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.722222222222 0.674092028746 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.21349557522 77% => OK
Readability: 45.5110192837 51.4728631049 88% => OK
Elegance: 1.30188679245 1.64882698954 79% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304786632495 0.391690518653 78% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0895345879992 0.123202303941 73% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0554301375596 0.077325440228 72% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.486698727941 0.547984918172 89% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.163600591994 0.149214159877 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11360310309 0.161403998019 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579786016616 0.0892212321368 65% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.391364624429 0.385218514788 102% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0117720717569 0.0692045440612 17% => Paragraphs are so close to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220375545521 0.275328986314 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382883125588 0.0653680567796 59% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.4325221239 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.30420353982 113% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88274336283 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 7.22455752212 97% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 13.5995575221 96% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.