Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education. Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented above.
I agree with the first statement that teaching morality should be the foundation of education. In the long run, this will enable us to produce a moral society of strong and independent individuals who are empathetic towards the needs of others and upload high values.
Usually, this is considered to be an utopian concept, but such an ambitious goal can be achieved if education imparts moral lessons at every stage. There are numerous studies that show children replicate behaviour of others from a very young age. If parents, teachers and peers alike follow the value system, then there are increased chances for the child too to follow suit.
Logical reasoning is also an important factor for the overall development of the society but it is a skill which can be learnt at a later stage. Logical reasoning and deductive reasoning come handy to solve the real life problems of society. While making us adept at problem solving, it cannot help us distinguish between right and wrong. Morals, on the hand are the base on which the education system relies on. Right from pre-school fables to special courses for college freshmen, moral lessons are necessary for being well-rounded individuals.
Thus, educational institutes and other policy making bodies should consider altering the syllabi if moral education is not yet included. There can be an option to create a mix of logical reasoning as well as moral values classes. Doing this will produce thinkers and leaders for a moral society. For instance, in some Scandinavian countries, moral lessons are imparted right from nursery till the time the education of the child is completed. Parents also play an integral role for teaching their children the do's and dont's of a moral society. We can also take the example of Japan to show that when logical reasoning is combined with moral lessons then the country works in tandem.
Therefore, teaching morality should be the foundation of education.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-07 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 70 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | RIYA MODI | 58 | view |
| 2023-09-02 | jayatyagi123@yahoo.co.in | 50 | view |
| 2023-04-07 | Aaishani De | 66 | view |
| 2022-11-21 | raghavchauhan619 | 62 | view |
- Governments should invest as much in the arts as they do in the military Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and support 50
- Claim Even though young people often receive the advice to follow your dreams more emphasis should be placed on picking worthy goals Reason Many people s dreams are inherently selfish Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or 64
- The chart below shows numbers of adults participating in different major sports in one area in 1997 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 57
- The following is a letter from the parent of a private school student to the principal of that school Last year Kensington Academy turned over management of its cafeteria to a private vendor Swift Nutrition This company serves low fat low calorie meals th 75
- The best way to teach whether as an educator employer or parent is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your positio 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 35, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
.... Usually, this is considered to be an utopian concept, but such an ambitious ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 33.0505617978 42% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 58.6224719101 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1636.0 2235.4752809 73% => OK
No of words: 322.0 442.535393258 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08074534161 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59938444756 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555900621118 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 704.065955056 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.9259636053 60.3974514979 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.2352941176 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9411764706 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05882352941 5.21951772744 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287841403256 0.243740707755 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102020308738 0.0831039109588 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0768539998823 0.0758088955206 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192245329049 0.150359130593 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0839068359957 0.0667264976115 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.