Education plays a vital role in the life of student. It is also considered one of the most challenging phases of a person's life. It is expected out of a student to balance out academics and develop their personality. In context to the prompt provided, I would like to strongly agree with it. A student should always question what they are taught instead of accepting it passively.
To support my opinion, I would like to present a few examples. Let us consider a scenario where students are self motivated and also encouraged to always question what they were being taught in the class. In such scenarios class becomes more interactive and interesting. Students of such class would develop a better understanding of the subjects. They would also be able to retain the things they learnt over an elongated period due to their participation during the class. Apart from academics, a student would also learn important life skills such as public speaking which would help them in their future. It would train the students to organise their thoughts and present them appropriately.
Now let us consider a scenario where students are not encouraged to question what they are taught. They are rather being trained to passively accept it. Such a scenarios would produce students who couldn't develop in-depth knowledge about the subjects. Students would tend to memorize things to secure good grades. They would also be always dependent on higher individuals to support them and tell them what they are supposed to do. This in long run would create a scenario where students have low self confidence and are afraid to put their ideas in front of higher authority.
By comparing both the examples, it is clear enough to understand that students belonging to first scenario would be creative enough and would contribute largely towards research and development. This would lead to the development of the society as a whole. By adapting this teaching method even a country which is lacking behind in certain regards could develop into a better version of itself. Even if a fully developed country starts to produce more of second type of students, over a period of years it is certain to saturate in various fields.
Thus, by providing above examples and a brief comparison between the two I, would like to conclude that it is always better that students ask what they are being taught rather than passively accepting it. This would help the students in various ways which will contribute to their betterment in the future. Along with their personal development, it would also contribute to the development of the entire nation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 116, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...one of the most challenging phases of a persons life. It is expected out of a student t...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 159, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a scenario' or simply 'scenarios'?
Suggestion: a scenario; scenarios
...ng trained to passively accept it. Such a scenarios would produce students who couldnt deve...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 198, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
... a scenarios would produce students who couldnt develop in-depth knowledge about the su...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, thus, apart from, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 33.0505617978 136% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 58.6224719101 116% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2186.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 438.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99086757991 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57476223824 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65933030993 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.474885844749 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 669.6 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.8480893066 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.44 118.986275619 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.52 23.4991977007 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.36 5.21951772744 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182193039327 0.243740707755 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0648682569651 0.0831039109588 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662036553334 0.0758088955206 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126274029142 0.150359130593 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437051108934 0.0667264976115 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.