The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but by the general welfare of its people.
Countries today, when spoke of, are classified as developed, developing or underdeveloped based on their economy, standard of living and other standard parameters. But when do we call a country a great nation? It is necessary that we recall here that when we refer to a nation we refer to all its people. Thereby, it is conscpicuos then that when we assosiate a nation with greatness it has to do with the people it constitutes of.
When a certain individual achieves fame, what is commonly enquired about is his/her upbringing. This individual is celebrated relatively more if he/she was from a middle class family instead of one that is abundantly rich. This is because the first example smittens in the common people with a thought that they too can achieve limelight if the other individual, arising from similar circumstances, did. Hence it is no doubt that if a nation regularly produces estimable individuals who were from the common mass, the nation must definitely be doing something systematically great.
Lets then consider the simpler notion to call a nation great simply based on the number of achievements of its rulers, artists or scientists. It does sound convincing for the technology that the country posseses is dependent on its scientists diligence. The nations well being depends on its ruler. And throughout history Kingdoms prevailed primarily due to its rulers achievements. The nations architecture replicates its rich tradition and so does its art. It should be straight forward for us now to conclude that the mere presence of great inviduals implies a great nation, shouldn’t it? But how fair is it to do so when these people (rulers, artists or scientists) only represent a limited percentage of the population? Without considering the well being of the majority of the population the nation is represented by, should we call it great?
Clearly, what is required in consideration here is how much role does a nation play in ensuring the success of its people. If a nation played no role in the development and success of their artists and scientists would it still be right call the nation great? It can be avered here that one can only do so given if it had placed systems to support its citizens in their endeavours. Only then can it produce hailed individuals and continue to do so.
It can be thus concluded that while the achievements of nation depends on the success of its rulers scientist and artist, it must cater to the welfare of the people to be able to continue to achieve greatness.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-12 | smithsonite79 | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-05 | Roshan Dhakal | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-27 | sushil koirala | 70 | view |
| 2019-10-24 | tomalika khan | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-19 | manu.bhardwaj60@gmail.com | 50 | view |
- The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but by the general welfare of its people. 50
- The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment. 60
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 50
- Universities should require students to take courses only within those fields they are interested in studying.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 417, Rule ID: CONSTITUTES_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'consists of'?
Suggestion: consists of
...eatness it has to do with the people it constitutes of. When a certain individual achieves fa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 312, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e common people with a thought that they too can achieve limelight if the other i...
^^
Line 2, column 406, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...rising from similar circumstances, did. Hence it is no doubt that if a nation regular...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
... doing something systematically great. Lets then consider the simpler notion to cal...
^^^^
Line 3, column 91, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tion great simply based on the number of achievements of its rulers, artists or s...
^^
Line 3, column 388, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...ily due to its rulers achievements. The nations architecture replicates its rich tradit...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'hence', 'if', 'so', 'still', 'then', 'thus', 'well', 'while', 'as to', 'no doubt']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.211538461538 0.240241500013 88% => OK
Verbs: 0.179487179487 0.157235817809 114% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0705128205128 0.0880659088768 80% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0641025641026 0.0497285424764 129% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0790598290598 0.0444667217837 178% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.115384615385 0.12292977631 94% => OK
Participles: 0.0448717948718 0.0406280797675 110% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.90772412631 2.79330140395 104% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0277777777778 0.030933414821 90% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0940170940171 0.0997080785238 94% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0213675213675 0.0249443105267 86% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.025641025641 0.0148568991511 173% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2534.0 2732.02544248 93% => OK
No of words: 428.0 452.878318584 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.92056074766 6.0361032391 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.58838876751 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.364485981308 0.366273622748 100% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.278037383178 0.280924506359 99% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.18691588785 0.200843997647 93% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.135514018692 0.132149295362 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90772412631 2.79330140395 104% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 219.290929204 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495327102804 0.48968727796 101% => OK
Word variations: 55.2318951221 55.4138127331 100% => OK
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6194690265 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.380952381 23.380412469 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9969764596 59.4972553346 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.666666667 141.124799967 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.380952381 23.380412469 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.571428571429 0.674092028746 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.21349557522 115% => OK
Readability: 48.1846906987 51.4728631049 94% => OK
Elegance: 1.15231788079 1.64882698954 70% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.488160256007 0.391690518653 125% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.152598691182 0.123202303941 124% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0827001833035 0.077325440228 107% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.531685218976 0.547984918172 97% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.153297839585 0.149214159877 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.183183746301 0.161403998019 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125254231354 0.0892212321368 140% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.31385006652 0.385218514788 81% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0795092835414 0.0692045440612 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.311757033222 0.275328986314 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.138647405721 0.0653680567796 212% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.4325221239 153% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.30420353982 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88274336283 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 14.0 7.22455752212 194% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 3.66592920354 0% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 17.0 13.5995575221 125% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.