Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance.
The author of the statement concludes that one of the striking factors for determine professor's salary’s ought to be based on their student's academic performance. While others believe that this claims is not fair due to several reasons. I don’t agree with this claim. Consider the both views and what follows my point would be delineated.
To begin with, as we all know that ability of students is considerably vital. As a matter of fact sometime their ability and their grade demonstrate that whether professor has be great or not. Nevertheless, we cannot conclude that provided that a student got a lower score, their teacher has been adverse in the class. Inasmuch, as a matter of fact, the ability of score of student is corresponds to variety factors such as their intelligent, knowledge, the degree of their smart and so forth. Hence, this indicates that as long as we want to determine for salary of professor, we should not take heed to student’s achievement during academic education without a shadow of doubt.
Furthermore, there is a considerable number of students who they are highly clearheaded and having a high level of IQ. As long as their teacher have a improper in the class, this situation will not be crucial for them. As a result they got a high score in the College. When we allocate a plethora of money for professor due to their high performance would not be evenhanded. By considering this fact, there is not any correlation between both.
Nonetheless, teacher's salaries can be changed during the time. In fact, there is a variety method for determining their salary such as the degree of knowledge, deal of experience, the number of books. Most of the times, teacher's income is based on their achievement of student. Whereas, there is students who they are a lower performance at class which is nor pertaining to the teacher. For example, one of my classmates in the university was immensely shiftless. He got a low grade in the final exam; nonetheless, all of us know that her teacher in the class was highly commitment to their teaching. Hence, provided that we want to decide for teacher's salary based on their student would not be equitable
By taking into account, this issue in considerably relative to situation. As a matter of fact, we cannot conclude that there is a direct relation between both. As a consequence, this would be prudent that teacher's salary determine based on other multiple factors such as their experience, knowledge, even their morality is definitely highly pivotal in every academic setting.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-09 | harshit kukreja | 50 | view |
| 2019-09-28 | Mohit Raghuvanshi | 83 | view |
| 2019-09-18 | ajonna | 66 | view |
| 2019-09-15 | Usama148 | 50 | view |
| 2019-09-09 | wenye | 50 | view |
- In an effort to improve our employees productivity we should implement electronic monitoring of employees Internet use from their workstations Employees who use the Internet from their workstations need to be identified and punished if we are to reduce th 53
- Person should never make an important decision alone 70
- Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia. Using an observation-centered approach to studying Tertian culture, he concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than 83
- 1. As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 50
- Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 164, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...on their students academic performance. While others believe that this claims is not ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 177, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
... demonstrate that whether professor has be great or not. Nevertheless, we cannot c...
^^
Line 6, column 150, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...el of IQ. As long as their teacher have a improper in the class, this situation w...
^
Line 6, column 220, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...situation will not be crucial for them. As a result they got a high score in the C...
^^
Line 8, column 289, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[3]
Message: Did you mean 'there are students'?
Suggestion: there are students
... their achievement of student. Whereas, there is students who they are a lower performance at cla...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 206, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...consequence, this would be prudent that teachers salary determine based on other multip...
^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 246, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...teachers salary determine based on other multiple factors such as their experienc...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, whereas, while, for example, in fact, such as, as a matter of fact, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 33.0505617978 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2140.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 431.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96519721578 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8284918352 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.46403712297 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 666.9 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 10.0 3.10617977528 322% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.5238274731 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0434782609 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7391304348 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47826086957 5.21951772744 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324998194115 0.243740707755 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0983765239821 0.0831039109588 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0882843932631 0.0758088955206 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197437494077 0.150359130593 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0593324904562 0.0667264976115 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 14.1392134831 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.