Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated.
Every little girl at some point of her life has dreamt of reaching out to the moon,or falling amidst the stars. This dream has successfully been made a virtual reality and looking ahead, might even become an unfathomable but easy quest for the little girl in the real world.
The given sentence that "Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives,only makes our lives more complicated" is an ironical statement yet, does falsify the entire purpose of the advent of technology into humanity. Every gadget invented till date, has made the work of mankind simple, from the use of washing machines instead of the age old technique of washing to the use of smart phones to connect the globe hence making it an insignificant yet huge sphere. It doesn't matter as to which part of the circle a person belongs to, every individual can peek an insight into any portion of the poles or tangent while miles away.
Technology, that has been molded by the human brain to decrease work-load has significantly captured the enthralling minds of all. This amicable companion of ours has waded its way into our lives and entwined itself to an extent than it cannot be untangled. We are able to complete tasks like building bridges over oceanic landscapes, sharing real time events with our mates in faraway lands, plunging into outer space adventures and some decade back unimaginable tasks without a time count.
Scientists aligned to technologically revolutionizing this world, have an aim to unlock the secret of the existence of life, thereby creating an era of achievable thoughts and actions which man holding hands with his technological friend will achieve as days pass-by.
Earlier, a decade or so ago, there were stories narrated by grandparents to their grandchildren as to how their vision beyond daylight was filled with meek darkness, how wondering what existed beyond the sea would engulf their entire mind-space, how wandering within natural boundaries and how their life began and death swallowed their kith and kin in the same location with limited visual scenes or genres of the world.
As a conclusion, of-course, the more the amount of technology that seeps in, the more complicated the process of its use would be in the start i.e, at the neonate stage, but once we get over that boulder of the beginning, the journey through it would be simple, yet, an adventurous ride, tickling portions of our own capacities that were earlier unexplored.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-17 | Siddiqur Rahman | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | phajaygv | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | Evil-wasp | 75 | view |
| 2019-10-10 | raolitesh@gmail.com | 66 | view |
| 2019-09-29 | xipaheje | 16 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 83, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , or
...e has dreamt of reaching out to the moon,or falling amidst the stars. This dream ha...
^^^
Line 3, column 11, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'sentences'.
Suggestion: sentences
...e girl in the real world. The given sentence that 'Technology, while apparently...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 87, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , only
...e apparently aimed to simplify our lives,only makes our lives more complicated' ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 485, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...it an insignificant yet huge sphere. It doesnt matter as to which part of the circle a...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, hence, if, look, so, while, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2071.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 410.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0512195122 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78190913608 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 258.0 215.323595506 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629268292683 0.4932671777 128% => OK
syllable_count: 644.4 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 23.0359550562 161% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 94.1875217648 60.3974514979 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 188.272727273 118.986275619 158% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.2727272727 23.4991977007 159% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.54545454545 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206063720385 0.243740707755 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0772694567679 0.0831039109588 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122902832262 0.0758088955206 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.085365079808 0.150359130593 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0948218157444 0.0667264976115 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.0 14.1392134831 149% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.92 48.8420337079 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.7 12.1743820225 145% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.05 8.38706741573 120% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 100.480337079 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 11.2143820225 150% => OK
text_standard: 21.0 11.7820224719 178% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.