There is little justification for society to make extraordinary efforts—especially at a great cost in money and jobs—to save endangered animal or plant species.
Currently, it is debatable whether the society should make extraordinary efforts to save endangered animal and plant species. Although some people believe that this effort is useless since it threatens people’s money and jobs, I argue that saving lives of endangered species are necessary work that people should take.
If the extinction is due to natural process, there is no justification to put efforts to save those endangered animals and plants. To illustrate, Darwin’s well-known theory of natural selection states that there are some species that are more incline to adopt in environment than others, and this indicates that extinction is sometimes a natural process. If animals or plants are disappeared due to this trend, the human efforts to save those lives are not required.
However, if the extinction is as a consequence of human activities, people should take measure to save these wildness lives. To be more specific, due to endless desire for efficiency and convenience, people in this present day and age continuously develop technologies and infrastructure. As a result, a huge portion of natural resources is used and environmental problems are aggravated. Due to this process, homes of many endangered animals and plants are threatened and the process of extinction exacerbate at the exponential rate. In such cases, people should participate in protecting these endangered species, since it was their activities that jeopardize these animals and plants.
In addition, activities of saving lives of endangered animals and plants should be taken since people have effective measurement to do so without the cost in money and jobs. For instance, it is possible that government designates a place as a national park and provides animals and plants a place to survive. In America, Yellowstone national park is a pristine forest that is home for thousands of animals and plant species. At the same time, since many visitors are coming to this park to enjoy natural views and see wildness species, the government can secure jobs of people and obtain profits from visitors. Consequently, it not only becomes a place to save endangered lives but also a place to foster economy. Therefore, people should put their efforts to save lives of animals, since it does not come at the expense of people’s money and jobs.
In conclusion, people should participate in saving lives of endangered animals and plants if the extinction is yield by human activities. They should take into consider that animals and plants are also crucial part of the planet, and without them, their lives can also be threatened.
- The following appeared in an editorial in a business magazine."Although the sales of Whirlwind video games have declined over the past two years, a recent survey of video-game players suggests that this sales trend is about to be reversed. The survey aske 70
- All parents should be required to volunteer time to their children s schools Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and sup 60
- The main benefit of the study of history is to dispel the illusion that people living now are significantly different from people who lived in earlier times.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 73
- The following appeared in a memo from the new vice president of Sartorian, a company that manufactures men's clothing."Five years ago, at a time when we had difficulties in obtaining reliable supplies of high quality wool fabric, we discontinued productio 70
- The following appeared in a memo from the owner of a chain of cheese stores located throughout the United States For many years all the stores in our chain have stocked a wide variety of both domestic and imported cheeses Last year however all of the five 70
saving lives of endangered species are necessary work that people should take.
saving lives of endangered species is a necessary work that people should take.
it not only becomes a place to save endangered lives but also a place to foster economy.
Description: 'Not only...but also' is not used properly. can you re-write this sentence?
if the extinction is yield by human activities.
if the extinction is yielded by human activities.
Sentence: They should take into consider that animals and plants are also crucial part of the planet, and without them, their lives can also be threatened.
Description: A preposition is not usually followed by a verb, base: uninflected present, imperative or infinitive
Suggestion: Refer to into and consider
flaws:
No. of Words: 421 while No. of Different Words: 181
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 18 15
No. of Words: 421 350
No. of Characters: 2143 1500
No. of Different Words: 181 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.53 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.09 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.78 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 166 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 125 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 76 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 57 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.389 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 4.968 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.556 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.381 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.576 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.112 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5