The issue that “Those who see their ideas through, regardless of doubts or criticism others may express, are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy” is true to some extent, but not entirely. I partially agree with the statement made. Being able to dodge criticism or doubts and stereotypes is definitely a good trait for any individual to have, it just shows how confident one is about his decision making. The flip side of this having over confidence which is really harmful for one’s progress in any field.
For instance, lets us consider the life of one of the great scientists and inventor Sir Thomas Alva Edison. He was thrown out of school and many of his teachers also criticized him, but he never cared about any and kept working on the science he loved. He believed in himself throughout this journey and absorbed all the criticism when he had an ambitious idea of inventing the bulb. He has left his mark on this very planet for his perseverance and believing in his thoughts and is still remembered as one of the great inventors and scientists of all time.
Let us now consider a scenario where a company is in crisis and its CEO decides to take an action purely based on his gut, which might obliterate the company. In this case, there might be other solutions to pull the company back from collapsing down entirely, which when discussed with other board members might come into light. In this case, the CEO is supposed to have doubts and should definitely consider the criticism and why they are doing it, else he will be remembered only for bad reasons.
On a whole the statement posed is not entirely true, it is good to dodge criticism and doubts others may express in some cases and take them and analyze what others are saying in some others. One should try to it the right balance of both.
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: harshgrovr
Essay Categories
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 384, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...n ambitious idea of inventing the bulb. He has left his mark on this very planet f...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, really, so, still, for instance, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1514.0 2235.4752809 68% => OK
No of words: 326.0 442.535393258 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64417177914 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46705874729 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579754601227 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 704.065955056 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2678946555 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.461538462 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0769230769 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.07692307692 5.21951772744 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262352187217 0.243740707755 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0881334836255 0.0831039109588 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.155218862705 0.0758088955206 205% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161316948611 0.150359130593 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13453339341 0.0667264976115 202% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.1392134831 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 100.480337079 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.